NFTs, the next wave of stupidity

[vanzandt]

Probably easier to survive where solar panels are most efficient, saying that, log cabin dwellers in the far north survive somehow.

Lotta solar panels lol.
They better have some high friggin' output Mick.
Don't overlook the fact that these figures...
are per square mile.

1. New York, NY

• Population density (per square mile): 27,747.9
• Change in population density since 2010: 1.87%
• 2019 population: 8,336,817
• 2010 population: 8,184,899
• 2019 land area (square miles): 300.4

Photo Credit: Alamy Stock Photo

2. San Francisco, CA

• Population density (per square mile): 18,790.8
• Change in population density since 2010: 9.46%
• 2019 population: 881,549
• 2010 population: 805,463
• 2019 land area (square miles): 46.9

Photo Credit: Alamy Stock Photo

3. Boston, MA

• Population density (per square mile): 14,362.6
• Change in population density since 2010: 11.74%
• 2019 population: 694,295
• 2010 population: 621,383
• 2019 land area (square miles): 48.3

Photo Credit: Alamy Stock Photo

4. Miami, FL

• Population density (per square mile): 13,000.5
• Change in population density since 2010: 16.68%
• 2019 population: 467,968
• 2010 population: 400,892
• 2019 land area (square miles): 36.0

Photo Credit: Alamy Stock Photo

5. Chicago, IL

• Population density (per square mile): 11,846.5
• Change in population density since 2010: -0.21%
• 2019 population: 2,693,959
• 2010 population: 2,698,831
• 2019 land area (square miles): 227.4

Photo Credit: Alamy Stock Photo

6. Philadelphia, PA

• Population density (per square mile): 11,796.8
• Change in population density since 2010: 3.66%
• 2019 population: 1,584,064
• 2010 population: 1,528,306
• 2019 land area (square miles): 134.3

Photo Credit: Alamy Stock Photo

7. Washington, DC

• Population density (per square mile): 11,545.9
• Change in population density since 2010: 16.76%
• 2019 population: 705,749
• 2010 population: 604,453
• 2019 land area (square miles): 61.1

Photo Credit: Alamy Stock Photo

8. Long Beach, CA

• Population density (per square mile): 9,122.7
• Change in population density since 2010: -0.30%
• 2019 population: 462,645
• 2010 population: 462,793
• 2019 land area (square miles): 50.7

Photo Credit: Alamy Stock Photo


9. Seattle, WA

• Population density (per square mile): 8,973.0
• Change in population density since 2010: 23.41%
• 2019 population: 753,655
• 2010 population: 610,710
• 2019 land area (square miles): 84.0

Photo Credit: Alamy Stock Photo

10. Los Angeles, CA

• Population density (per square mile): 8,476.4
• Change in population density since 2010: 4.80%
• 2019 population: 3,979,537
• 2010 population: 3,797,144
• 2019 land area (square miles): 469.5

 

[themickey]

Lotta solar panels lol.
They better have some high friggin' output Mick.

Matey, plenty of houses have solar panels in Perth which produce more than consumed, they pump lelectrichity back into the grid.

 

[Overnight]

Matey, plenty of houses have solar panels in Perth which produce more than consumed, they pump lelectrichity back into the grid.
View attachment 274208

That's because the entire Australian continent is a desert. It's Florida Sunshine on steroids. Of COURSE solar works there!

 

[themickey]

That's because the entire Australian continent is a desert. It's Florida Sunshine on steroids. Of COURSE solar works there!

Don't tell me, tell vanzee.

 

[Cryptjitsu]

1. Because it is fucking TECHNOLOGY, not art.
2. You didn't get my point. It is electricity based, without that it doesn't exist.
3. Sure because I am not buying it. They want it to be valued high, but if we can convince people just how UTTER BS an NFT is, it will stay valueless. I mean normal people, not complete morons.

You are RIGHT. They are WRONG and complete idiots.
Does not change reality.

Nor has this same thought process by various experts changed the fact that the same exact scenarios are being played out in Real Estate, Modern Art, Equities & Corporate Bond markets.

 

[Cryptjitsu]

Nor do 90% of us Pek... at least after 3 months.

I doubt the world could even survive internet being down for 3 months.

 

[Overnight]

I doubt the world could even survive internet being down for 3 months.

We can survive without electricity for a time.

But with the whole Internet out, the entire world would collapse in a day due to societal unrest, because no smartphone=abject panic through lack of access to Tic-Tok and Angry Birds.

Oh, and banks and shit.

 

[Pekelo]

You are RIGHT. They are WRONG and complete idiots.
Does not change reality.

The reality is this, people who invest in NFTs are:

1. In it knowingly, for illegal reasons like money launderers.
2. Greedy bastards who try to pass NFTs to the bigger idiots.
3. Fucking morons.

The real question is, are you one of them and which one you are?

 

[vanzandt]

We can survive without electricity for a time.

Yeah right.
If the grid went down and stayed down for 2 months, this country would look something like that movie "Escape From New York". At least the cities would.

 

[Cryptjitsu]

2. Greedy bastards who try to pass NFTs to the bigger idiots.

Greater Fool Theory.
Welcome to modern day finance & economics.