Newt just managed to spin the "open marriage" thing into a positive.

Quote from Maverick74:

So why did you come back as another alias after being banned?
More...
So it only took 97 posts, some of which were in your adopted thread, for you to figure it out (after someone else said so first). You're quite the pattern recognition guy, aren't you? :p

I was banned because I took marketsurfer to task for using his "journal" as a soapbox. The moderator and I had words. I lost. I was kindly offered reinstatement, but I chose to start anew. Thanks for asking.

Does this mean I won't be able to further distill your use of ACD in your thread? As you know, I have no interest in using it myself. I read the book twice, and it's just not to my taste. However, I think your explanation can be simplified because I think you overcomplicate it. Just my opinion, of course, but I'd like to boil it down with a couple more follow-up questions for you. I would think the exchange would be of some insight to your readers. Bottom line, I don't doubt you know how to use the method to good effect. I just think you are employing too much verbiage.
 
Quote from wjk:

...the reporting on those you mentioned was far more favorable...
More...
Yes, it really didn't hurt Hart's, Edwards' or Spitzers' political career, eh?
Quote from wjk:

First of all, I don't get embarrassed...
More...
The self-unaware seldom do.
 
Quote from Brass:

So it only took 97 posts, some of which were in your adopted thread, for you to figure it out (after someone else said so first). You're quite the pattern recognition guy, aren't you? :p

I was banned because I took marketsurfer to task for using his "journal" as a soapbox. The moderator and I had words. I lost. I was kindly offered reinstatement, but I chose to start anew. Thanks for asking.

Does this mean I won't be able to further distill your use of ACD in your thread? As you know, I have no interest in using it myself. I read the book twice, and it's just not to my taste. However, I think your explanation can be simplified because I think you overcomplicate it. Just my opinion, of course, but I'd like to boil it down with a couple more follow-up questions for you. I would think the exchange would be of some insight to your readers. Bottom line, I don't doubt you know how to use the method to good effect. I just think you are employing too much verbiage.
More...

I have to admit. I'm off my game. Kudos to Lucrum for catching it. You're right, I dropped the ball. I usually spot aliases very fast. And no, as I said before, I'll answer any question you have on my thread provided you come there and treat everyone with respect. I could care less what your politics are. This is a trading forum, not a political forum.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

I have to admit. I'm off my game. Kudos to Lucrum for catching it. You're right, I dropped the ball. I usually spot aliases very fast. And no, as I said before, I'll answer any question you have on my thread provided you come there and treat everyone with respect. I could care less what your politics are. This is a trading forum, not a political forum.
More...
Fair enough.

Kudos to Lucrum? It took him over 95 posts. And this even though I made it a point not to alter my writing style in any way. You'd think that someone who regularly followed my log-in patterns, as he himself admitted, would be a bit more attuned. (Perhaps you should ask Lucrum about this peculiar fascination of his.) I've already received a couple of PMs asking the same question after only my first couple dozen posts or so.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

Lucrum! I owe you a beer. That's him. And he is right. He has never used those aliases as you "spelled" them. That's him. God Damn man, I owe you like 12 beers now. They are really piling up. :)
More...

I'm getting thirsty just thinking about them. :D
 
Quote from Lucrum:

You remind me of a former ET alias, thunderpussy/gayfly1. Who I noticed was briefly logged on not too long ago. About the same time you showed up.

Any relation?
More...
GayFly!!!! That's one of the very first assholes I put on ignore. I guess I'll just put Brass on the list and avoid all his stupid comments.

I wish Baron would put IP addresses up with posters names so we can easily know when slime returns.
 
Quote from Brass:

Fair enough.

Kudos to Lucrum? It took him over 95 posts. And this even though I made it a point not to alter my writing style in any way. You'd think that someone who regularly followed my log-in patterns, as he himself admitted, would be a bit more attuned. (Perhaps you should ask Lucrum about this peculiar fascination of his.) I've already received a couple of PMs asking the same question after only a couple dozen posts or so.
More...

Well, since they FINALLY figured it out.... I will again welcome you back:D

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/M6o0Cah5kQU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Quote from wjk:

Neither do the self important, arrogant types such as yourself.
More...
You're looking in the mirror. I only reflect what I see. And regarding your comment that the media's treatment of Democrats was more favorable, you did't quite answer the question:
Quote from Brass:

Yes, it really didn't hurt Hart's, Edwards' or Spitzers' political career, eh?
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top