NEWSFLASH - Baron is FutureCurrents!
- Thread starter blah12345678
- Start date
you lying troll... nasa says it cools. and bouncing the suns energy back into space is cooling.
arguing for some outdated definition in the face of science to the contrary... is troll sophistry.
Does anyone with a brain think NASA is wrong because you found and outdated definition.
1, http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
2. Also when you look up the definition such as
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/greenhouse-gas
nothing in the definition excludes the concept that co2 could also cool.
arguing for some outdated definition in the face of science to the contrary... is troll sophistry.
Does anyone with a brain think NASA is wrong because you found and outdated definition.
1, http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
2. Also when you look up the definition such as
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/greenhouse-gas
nothing in the definition excludes the concept that co2 could also cool.
agw birther.
fraudcurrents you lying troll... nasa says it cools. and bouncing the suns energy back into space is cooling.
arguing for some outdated definition in the face of science to the contrary... is troll sophistry.
Does anyone with a brain think NASA is wrong because you found and outdated definition.
1, http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
NASA just told you it is a very effective coolant. see that word above...
arguing for some outdated definition in the face of science to the contrary... is troll sophistry.
Does anyone with a brain think NASA is wrong because you found and outdated definition.
1, http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
NASA just told you it is a very effective coolant. see that word above...
maybe you need to learn learn some science troll.
NASA says CO2 is one of the most efficient coolants in the atmosphere and that it acts a thermostat. only a moron or a lying ass troll insists that it only warms.
NASA says CO2 is one of the most efficient coolants in the atmosphere and that it acts a thermostat. only a moron or a lying ass troll insists that it only warms.
1, http://science.nasa.gov/science-news...2/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
