Usual sees this and is horrified at the sight of a 30 round mag.
Admittedly, I’m horrified. I looked hard, real hard, but could not find any evidence of additional clips.
New Zealand Hit With Mass Shooting 27 Dead
- Thread starter wildchild
- Start date
Admittedly, I’m horrified. I looked hard, real hard, but could not find any evidence of additional clips.
I saw some very nice "bumper" stock there though.
%%
True.Like the black woman said ''black guns matter''.LOL Blue live matter also.The El Paso TX,police chief warned ''political correctness is poisoning the world''
Looking @ other side of the trade; i planted what they call ''gangbuster pine seedlings'' Most USa southern sheriffs will not enforce anti gun stupidity; + tell the dog oWners,'' keep the dogs @ home''LOL
,
although a piece of old news, it just shows why the white supremacist movement is rising.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-votes-against-anti-nazi-resolution-at-united-nations/
U.S. votes against anti-Nazi resolution at U.N.
excerpts:
UNITED NATIONS -- The United States says it was one of three countries to vote against a U.N. resolution condemning the glorification of Nazism over freedom of speech issues and concerns that Russia was using it to carry out political attacks against its neighbors.
The resolution entitled "Combating glorification of Nazism, Neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance," was approved by the U.N.'s human rights committee on Friday with 131 in favor, 3 against with 48 abstentions.
Ukraine and Palau were the other no votes.
"We condemn without reservation all forms of religious and ethnic intolerance or hatred at home and around the world," said Deputy U.S. Representative to the Economic and Social Council Stefanie Amadeo, explaining the U.S. vote.
"However, due to this resolution's overly narrow scope and politicized nature, and because it calls for unacceptable limits on the fundamental freedom of expression, the United States cannot support it," Amadeo said.
She said the U.S. also disagrees with the resolution's willing to curb freedom of expression even while sharing its concerns about the rise of hate speech around the world.
"This resolution's recommendations to limit freedom of expression, freedom of association, and the right to peaceful assembly contravene the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and must be opposed," Amadeo said.
Unlike resolutions in the Security Council, resolutions in General Assembly committees are not considered legally binding.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-votes-against-anti-nazi-resolution-at-united-nations/
U.S. votes against anti-Nazi resolution at U.N.
excerpts:
UNITED NATIONS -- The United States says it was one of three countries to vote against a U.N. resolution condemning the glorification of Nazism over freedom of speech issues and concerns that Russia was using it to carry out political attacks against its neighbors.
The resolution entitled "Combating glorification of Nazism, Neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance," was approved by the U.N.'s human rights committee on Friday with 131 in favor, 3 against with 48 abstentions.
Ukraine and Palau were the other no votes.
"We condemn without reservation all forms of religious and ethnic intolerance or hatred at home and around the world," said Deputy U.S. Representative to the Economic and Social Council Stefanie Amadeo, explaining the U.S. vote.
"However, due to this resolution's overly narrow scope and politicized nature, and because it calls for unacceptable limits on the fundamental freedom of expression, the United States cannot support it," Amadeo said.
She said the U.S. also disagrees with the resolution's willing to curb freedom of expression even while sharing its concerns about the rise of hate speech around the world.
"This resolution's recommendations to limit freedom of expression, freedom of association, and the right to peaceful assembly contravene the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and must be opposed," Amadeo said.
Unlike resolutions in the Security Council, resolutions in General Assembly committees are not considered legally binding.
Russia has a history of sponsoring bills like this in the United Nations where Putin justifys the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republic’s occupation of the Baltic States.
What is interesting the apparent loss of prestige the United States in foreign affairs as indicated by all the other votes that were either the opposite of the United States or all the abstensions. 1 or 2 countries sided with the US out of the whole world. I would like to see the UN bill itself.
Attached below are two additional articles on this subject.
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-abstains-from-un-vote-on-nazism/
https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/gashc4253.doc.htm