New York Times Profits Down 50%: Print, Digital Revenues Still Falling

More in the "whocouldanode" column - Being a mouthpiece of the corrupt "most transparent administration in history" isn't something people want to buy. And with such critical thinkers as Paul Krugman writing, too! Shocking, I say.

Hopefully, they'll follow Air America rather quickly.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journa...-Down-50-Print-Digital-Revenues-Still-Falling

The New York Times announced Thursday that profits had fallen nearly 50% in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to the same period a year before. Earnings per share dropped by roughly two-thirds, from $0.76 to $0.24. Total revenues were down 5.2% and advertising revenues were down 6.3%, with print advertising revenues falling by 7.0% and digital by 4.3% over 2013. The company added digital subscribers, up 19% in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to same period in 2012, but its circulation revenues were down, too.

The Times' results will surprise analysts who had predicted healthy results for the last three months of 2013. Analysts have tended to focus on the increase in digital subscriptions to the New York Times, which has been a focus for new CEO Mark Thompson, formerly of the BBC. However, the rise in digital readers has not come with a corresponding rise in digital advertising revenues. Ultimately, the question is whether readers still want the content the Times is providing. That remains to be seen, since online competition for center-left news is tight.

It is not the first time that the Times has experienced such a decline in advertising revenues
 
Really Tao, the decline in news print wasn't already happening? I noticed you've been posting from briebart lately, did you get a subscription? I met one of their reporters and visited over beers a while back, he said he'd call me when he needs his house roofed and he knows I voted Obama...go figure.
 
Really Tao, the decline in news print wasn't already happening? I noticed you've been posting from briebart lately, did you get a subscription? I met one of their reporters and visited over beers a while back, he said he'd call me when he needs his house roofed and he knows I voted Obama...go figure.

No one anticipated the decline in profits to this magnitude, BA. In fact, they estimated a slight gain in the last three periods.

As for your getting a call from the Breitbart reporter to do his house roof, I hope you're not clearing your schedule in order to make room for that "appointment".
 
No one anticipated the decline in profits to this magnitude, BA. In fact, they estimated a slight gain in the last three periods.

As for your getting a call from the Breitbart reporter to do his house roof, I hope you're not clearing your schedule in order to make room for that "appointment".

YUK YUK YUK you're a funny man. If he roofs it I'll probably get the job if I want to work in the hill country. He is a hell of a lot more civil than you fuckers on here are. We've visited a few times, he's got some good stories from his travels. It's like I've said before one on one we're all pretty much the same, want to make a good living, see our kids have a little security and some fun. Politics is just a hat we wear sometimes, it's not the real person.
 
Yes, you're far more civil than I.

I'm more honest than you are Tao. You lie down with dogs and expect to be treated like you're above the fray. I'll call out a bully when I see one. You try to pick on me I'll call your ass out. You aren't any better than I on this board, less so because you're fake sometimes.
 
I'm more honest than you are Tao.
NO, you're not. Shall I post the list of your most memorable hypocrisies - again?
You lie down with dogs and expect to be treated like you're above the fray.
This is called psychological projection. Look it up if you don't know what it means.
I'll call out a bully when I see one. You try to pick on me I'll call your ass out.
As many times as you've exhibited an obsession with so called bullies. I can only surmise you were bullied like a bitch when you were a kid.
You aren't any better than I on this board, less so because you're fake sometimes.
Well we all have the same membership privileges, if that's what you mean.
Tao is more intellectually honest, intelligent, better informed, well read and civil in debate than you. If that's what you mean.
 
I'm more honest than you are Tao. You lie down with dogs and expect to be treated like you're above the fray. I'll call out a bully when I see one. You try to pick on me I'll call your ass out. You aren't any better than I on this board, less so because you're fake sometimes.

If that's the story you want to sell yourself, go on selling.

I call you out because you're incorrect. If Lucrum or any of the other guys who you consistently get into fights with enters a discussion with me and I believe them to be wrong, I call them out too. They just don't get pissy about it like you do.
 
You got anything else Tao ?

Apologies for the delay, BA. I have other, more important things to do today than to sit there hitting reload and waiting for you to reply so I can quickly respond. Forgive me.
 
Back
Top