New York Times Hit Peace on Boehner to come out in October

Quote from Tsing Tao:

thank you, captain obvious. so when i vote this november, how do i best achieve this goal? should i abstain? will that do it?
More...

We gotta start somewhere. Clown trading is not profitable.
 
Oh please... these numbers were from Obama's budget. How fiscally conservative are you really?

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2900281>

2m85gmv.gif

Quote from bigdavediode:

By contrast, I'm a fiscal conservative and will vote for whatever party will reduce the deficit. Clearly the Republicans have not been, and are not, that party.

Looking at the CBO projections right now, and the already reduced deficit this year, the Democrats seem to be doing it (albeit too slowly).
More...
 
Quote from Trader666:

Oh please... these numbers were from Obama's budget. How fiscally conservative are you really?]
More...

Extremely fiscally conservative. So let's take a look at your graphs:

1) Your first chart is out of date and is based on an old projection. The current CBO projection for the deficit is $1.34 trillion, down from $1.4 trillion and down from $1.5 trillion at the end of Bush's last fiscal budget (2009)

2) The second graph includes Bush's last fiscal year (2009), blames Obama for it, and then uses out of date deficit projections to project the debt. Worst of all, it doesn't appear to count Bush's "off-budget" "emergency" expenditures which the Republicans hid and Obama has merged into the budget.
 
Extremely fiscally conservative? ROTFLMAO!!!! No sane fiscal conservative would even come close to approving of the democraps' spending on steroids.

If you want to nitpick, the latest version of Obama's budget projects the national debt at $16.68 trillion in 2020, up from "only" $15.4 trillion in the graph I posted.
Quote from bigdavediode:

Extremely fiscally conservative. So let's take a look at your graphs:

1) Your first chart is out of date and is based on an old projection. The current CBO projection for the deficit is $1.34 trillion, down from $1.4 trillion and down from $1.5 trillion at the end of Bush's last fiscal budget (2009)

2) The second graph includes Bush's last fiscal year (2009), blames Obama for it, and then uses out of date deficit projections to project the debt. Worst of all, it doesn't appear to count Bush's "off-budget" "emergency" expenditures which the Republicans hid and Obama has merged into the budget.
More...
 
Quote from Trader666:

Extremely fiscally conservative? ROTFLMAO!!!! No sane fiscal conservative would even come close to approving of the democraps' spending on steroids.

If you want to nitpick, the latest version of Obama's budget projects the national debt at $16.68 trillion in 2020, up from "only" $15.4 trillion in the graph I posted.
More...

So I should be upset at the Democrats' spending when the deficit is down?

Or is it 10 years projections (which I never take seriously) that I'm supposed to give more weight to?
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

So I should be upset at the Democrats' spending when the deficit is down?

Or is it 10 years projections (which I never take seriously) that I'm supposed to give more weight to?
More...

sorry, which deficit is down?
 
Only a troll or a fool would claim he's "extremely fiscally conservative" and then defend the indefensible.

Are you posting your desperate bullshit because you're afraid the democraps' socialist welfare state agenda will crash into a wall in November?
Quote from bigdavediode:

So I should be upset at the Democrats' spending when the deficit is down?

Or is it 10 years projections (which I never take seriously) that I'm supposed to give more weight to?
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top