I find it interesting that Republicans characterize reporting of an affair as a "hit piece" all of a sudden. But I'm not surprised by it.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
New York Times Hit Peace on Boehner to come out in October
- Thread starter Navin Johnson
- Start date
I find it interesting that Republicans characterize reporting of an affair as a "hit piece" all of a sudden. But I'm not surprised by it.
This is just politics as usual, and politics has no loyalties.
I still remember the "leaked" story of McCain having a black baby when he was in the primary against Bush. It's politics.
I still remember the "leaked" story of McCain having a black baby when he was in the primary against Bush. It's politics.
Quote from Navin Johnson:
Run along fat Dave. It is clear that you lack the brain power to carry on an honest discussion.
He knows it's crap. He is some intern who works for the DNC or some Soros group probably. He showed up here right before the '08 election and dutifully posted the day's obama talking points and argued with anyone who dared criticze obama. Day after the election, no more bigdave.
Now, like a bad penny, he's back.
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
He knows it's crap. He is some intern who works for the DNC or some Soros group probably. He showed up here right before the '08 election and dutifully posted the day's obama talking points and argued with anyone who dared criticze obama. Day after the election, no more bigdave.
Now, like a bad penny, he's back.
I agree. You cannot have a reasonable discussion with him.
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
He knows it's crap. He is some intern who works for the DNC or some Soros group probably. He showed up here right before the '08 election and dutifully posted the day's obama talking points and argued with anyone who dared criticze obama. Day after the election, no more bigdave.
Now, like a bad penny, he's back.
Apparently you two don't realize the search function on this website allows you to search posts from me from one year ago, six months ago, and so on. In fact, for anyone who pays attention they could see that on the global warming thread alone had posts from me since the election. I also enjoyed Obama birth certificate threads, which I found particularly hilarious, as you could read if you wanted to do any basic research.
Good luck on your next accusation, though! (You could try insulting my mother, that's always a popular one. According to the people I debate with, she blew the Navy. I don't believe it, though, since I'm pretty sure she was never in the Navy.)
Quote from bigdavediode:
Apparently you two don't realize the search function on this website allows you to search posts from me from one year ago, six months ago, and so on. In fact, for anyone who pays attention they could see that on the global warming thread alone had posts from me since the election. I also enjoyed Obama birth certificate threads, which I found particularly hilarious, as you could read if you wanted to do any basic research.
Good luck on your next accusation, though! (You could try insulting my mother, that's always a popular one. According to the people I debate with, she blew the Navy. I don't believe it, though, since I'm pretty sure she was never in the Navy.)
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Why would anyone with a life want to waste time searching the posts of an obvious plant? For a refresher course in the day's Soros Inc talking points?
If I need a non sequitor though, I will look you up.
If I need a non sequitor though, I will look you up.