New York Times Hires Anti-White Racist For Ed Page

Recently some baseball players were subjected to marxist public shaming and the inevitable hostage tape forced apologies over a handful of tweets they sent in their teen years to their buddies. They used now forbidden words to indicate less than the required full acceptance of homosexuality and one had the temerity to reuse words from a rap "song." Ok, so they preferred to continue their lucrative careers and not end up like John Rocker, I see that.

Now in one of those life comes at you fast moments, the NY Times has proudly hired for its editorial page a woman who was born in Korea, moved here and has apparently spent much of her time tweeting nasty anti-white messages to her many followers. There literally are too many to quote but this article has a sampling of them. http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/02/lefty-journos-nyt-racist-hire/

One example, "Dumbass fucking white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants."

This is the same NYTimes whose young publisher recently lectured the president of the United States on the need to treat people respectfully and not to incite displeasure with the esteemed media among his followers.

The Times was not amused by the internet meltdown her hiring provoked. They defended her tweets by claiming that as an asian woman writing about tech, she had been subject to online harassment and the tweets had been her attempt to "imitate the rhetoric of her harassers". Seriously, you have to give them credit for trying to touch as many bases as possible. Minority? Check, although I'm not sure why a Korean gets special credit in the US. I'm not aware they were put into slavery etc. Woman? Of course. Woman in tech? We know hateful those nerds in Silicon Valley are, so check. Harassment? They clearly want to claim the #MeToo checkmark here but she only qualifies for the online version, but WTF, check.

This business about "imitating the rhetoric of her harassers" is brilliant though. It's more elegant than the usual "STFU Nazi", and it suggests that dimwitted conservatives simply could not grasp the brilliance of her parody. It's also an improvement over the "my account was hacked" excuse that no one ever believed. Or maybe that is just reserved for black women.

Maybe CNN drama queen Jim Acosta did have a point when he said he felt like he wasn't in America anymore. Me neither.
 
So what you're saying is instead of the closeted anti-white racists they normally hire, they just hired an openly anti-white racist, correct?
 
Democrats havent changed much since their days of creating the kkk, the only difference is the race they are choosing to be openly hostile towards. No one will willingly accept socialism when the writing is on the wall in places like Venezuela, so they need to convince people that someone is the cause of their problems, back then it was black people, today its white people.
 
So what you're saying is instead of the closeted anti-white racists they normally hire, they just hired an openly anti-white racist, correct?

Apparently so. They are thrilled about that dumb socialist woman who won the election in NY. They are making it clear that is their audience now. They are not that far out of the mainstream in NYC. The mayor shares the same views, if anything to a greater extent.

The fact the stunning hypocrisy in hiring such an odious person did not occur to them seems unbelievable. They don't see it as hypocrisy, but rather a recognition that the normal rules are not binding on leftist zealots. Who can blame them? When was the last time one went to jail for rioting or lost his job? Of course it's ok and funny for her to viciously mock and attack white males. On their side of the mirror, they know everything is tribal now. It's only the cowed white people who continue to pretend otherwise.
 
Democrats havent changed much since their days of creating the KKK.
Actually they have changed a lot.They no longer represent racist white confederate state southerners like The KKK,the republican party represents them now.
 
Actually they have changed a lot.They no longer represent racist white confederate state southerners like The KKK,the republican party represents them now.


Instead, they now represent the racist non white urban centers, literally nothing changed except the geographical location. There is only one side in this day and age who thinks it is morally acceptable to attack people solely based on race.
 
Instead, they now represent the racist non white urban centers, literally nothing changed except the geographical location. There is only one side in this day and age who thinks it is morally acceptable to attack people solely based on race.


Most of the Republican party worships the confederacy,a group that fought to keep black people as slaves.
 
Insert "Black" into "White" on every single article from the left and see how acceptable it is.

Attacking people based on race does not mean you are tackling racism.
 
Back
Top