New York judge finds Donald Trump liable for fraud

GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik files ethics complaint against Trump NY fraud trial judge

The reality... Elise Stefanik and her complaint are completely laughable. As noted earlier, Elise Stefanik is an idiot and her "ethics complaint" about the judge and demanding the judge's removal based on "judicial bias" is obviously baseless and laughable. As noted already in the media Stefanik's complaint is full of lies, conjecture, and reads like one of Trump's rambling late night Truth Social posts.


“Laughingstock” Rep. Stefanik Asks Ethics Commission To Discipline Trump Judge In NYC
https://www.tampafp.com/laughingstock-rep-stefanik-discipline-trump-judge/

Former prosecutor on Stefanik’s ethics complaint against NY fraud judge: ‘She knows better’

https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...se-stefaniks-ethics-complaint-ny-fraud-trial/

‘She Knows Better’: Former FBI General Counsel Slams Stefanik’s ‘Irresponsible’ Ethics Complaint Against Trump Judge

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/she-kno...onsible-ethics-complaint-against-trump-judge/
 
Just hours after an appeals court temporarily lifts the gag order issued by Judge Engoron protecting his clerk, Trump demonstrates exactly why it's necessary.

Trump fraud trial: With gag order lifted, Trump blasts judge's clerk online
The former president is on trial in New York for allegedly defrauding lenders.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-upda...ed-trump-blasts-judges-clerk-online-104966029
Just hours after the ban is lifted Trump shows why freedom of speech is necessary, the good, bad and ugly parts of it
This verdict in this case has already been rendered.....no jury to influence.
 
Just hours after the ban is lifted Trump shows why freedom of speech is necessary, the good, bad and ugly parts of it
This verdict in this case has already been rendered.....no jury to influence.

So you believe intimidating the judicial staff, judge, DA and witnesses is somehow good -- coupled with all the threats of violence against them. If this was any other defendant they would have been locked up in jail awaiting trial a long time ago.
 
So you believe intimidating the judicial staff, judge, DA and witnesses is somehow good -- coupled with all the threats of violence against them. If this was any other defendant they would have been locked up in jail awaiting trial a long time ago.
Your original link is not working from ABC news.
I think there are other conclusions that can be rendered from Trumps statement
 
All personal opinions

The site labels Greenfield a “Democrat operative and hack” and accuses her of “unethical partisan Democrat activities”. It also suggests that Engoron should be “investigated and removed from the bench”.

Not long after that, Trump himself entered the fray. On his own social media platform, Truth Social, he attacked Greenfield as a “politically biased and out of control, Trump-hating clerk”.
 
All personal opinions

The site labels Greenfield a “Democrat operative and hack” and accuses her of “unethical partisan Democrat activities”. It also suggests that Engoron should be “investigated and removed from the bench”.

Not long after that, Trump himself entered the fray. On his own social media platform, Truth Social, he attacked Greenfield as a “politically biased and out of control, Trump-hating clerk”.

Now tell me -- if anyone else did this... How many hours before they judge had them locked up in jail for intimidating the judge, judicial staff, witnesses, and DA?
 
Now tell me -- if anyone else did this... How many hours before they judge had them locked up in jail for intimidating the judge, judicial staff, witnesses, and DA?
You are calling it intimidation?
What does Trump have to gain from this "intimidation", Its certainly a negative for Trump
Is it intimidation if there is nothing to gain
 
Back
Top