He could have asked more generically, yes, but a change in living conditions could help explain Lucrum's observation that incarceration didn't used to cost so much. Maybe those conditions have been excessively improved.Quote from Tsing Tao:
Because he would have asked that, if that was the reason for his question. Which you know, of course.
Quote from Ricter:
He could have asked more generically, yes, but a change in living conditions could help explain Lucrum's observation that incarceration didn't used to cost so much. Maybe those conditions have been excessively improved.
Quote from Ricter:
He could have asked more generically, yes, but a change in living conditions could help explain Lucrum's observation that incarceration didn't used to cost so much. Maybe those conditions have been excessively improved.
Quote from Tsing Tao:
Who gives a shit, dude? It's JAIL. What kind of stupid ass question is that?
I've often thought we should occasionally use some kind of "life force calculus" for sentencing. Somehow it's more acceptable for a guy like Madoff to take a couple of years off the life of thousands, than it is for another guy to simply kill 20.Quote from Spike Trader:
My dads ex-broker(the guys retired now)is a close friend of Madoff and visits him regularly.He says Madoff lives like a king, eats the best of foods, ice-cream and everything with all the comforts he had on the outside.Surely there's a cost factor involved somewhere in there.
Quote from wilburbear:
It's not so much what jail costs, it's that there might have been 20k, spent at exactly the right time earlier on, (perhaps on education), to avoid this whole mess.............