Quote from stwh:
As far as I understand it, a MM is the counterparty that stands to provide liquidity in all market conditions to its clients, albeit with wider spread or sometimes "dynamic spread adjustment" as is described by Oanda which is a market maker.
On the contrary, an ECN does not guarantee execution of trade orders but pass them through to matching liquidity providers. Therefore, on average an ECN may end up charging less spread and/or commission but the risk of order non-fulfilment falls on clients' shoulders.
If my understanding is correct and FXCM is a market maker as advertised, then your firm must therefore guarantee trade executions no matter what market condition is with the consequences of flexible spreads as oftern enountered. Is this correct? Can you please confirm?
Hi Stwh,
Welcome to the forum
FXCM now offers clients a choice between two types of forex execution: No Dealing Desk (NDD) and Dealing Desk. The execution you choose impacts your trading experience and spreads. While FXCM believes that NDD execution provides the best all-around trading experience, we also offer dealing desk execution as an option for traders whose primary concern is low spreads. Because we can create the prices on which you trade, FXCM's dealing desk execution option is able to offer spreads for FXCM's 12 most popular currency pairs that may be up to one pip lower than those provided by the No Dealing Desk (NDD) model.
In regards to your question about trade execution, FXCM maintains a no re-quote policy. That means regardless of which execution model you choose, your orders will be filled based on available liquidity. FXCM aims to provide clients with the best execution available and to get all orders filled at the requested rate. However, there are times when, due to an increase in volatility or volume, orders may be subject to slippage. It's worth noting that slippage can be either positive or negative. Positive slippage is also referred to as price improvements. The stats below show that FXCM clients get price improvements on their orders just as frequently as negative slippage.
Slippage most commonly occurs during fundamental news events or periods of limited liquidity. During periods such as these, your order type, quantity demanded, and specific order instructions can have an impact on the overall execution you receive. For example, when triggered, stop orders become market orders available for execution at the best available market price. Stop orders guarantee execution but do not guarantee a particular price. Therefore, stop orders may incur slippage depending on market conditions. On the other hand, limit orders guarantee price but do not guarantee execution. In cases where the liquidity pool is not large enough to fill a limit order, the order would not be executed but instead reset until the order can be filled.
There are techniques you can use to
maximize price improvements and minimize negative slippage.
How To Maximize Positive Slippage - USE LIMIT AND LIMIT ENTRY ORDERS
FXCM recommends opening and closing trades using limit and limit entry orders in most cases. The benefit to these order types is that you are guaranteed to receive your requested price or better without receiving negative slippage. Remember, that although limit orders guarantee price they do not guarantee execution making order types an important consideration in any trading decision.
How to Minimize Negative Slippage - USE MARKET RANGE ORDER TYPES
For example, when trading with market orders, FXCM recommends setting the order type to "market range" on our Trading Station platform to avoid potentially receiving negative slippage. A market range order type allows you to control the amount of slippage your order can receive when it executes allowing for price certainty (see image below).
A market range of "X" pips assures that all or part of your order will be filled within a "X" pip range of the current market price ("X" pips above or "X" pips below) if liquidity is available.
Jason