NEW Video Info - 9/11: Chemical Engineer Found Nanothermite in WTC Dust

[AMT4SWA]

Quote from DirkDigler:

"A proponent of psychic warfare, Stubblebine was involved in a U.S. military project to create "a breed of 'super soldier'" who would "have the ability to become invisible at will and to walk through walls".

Just another tiny snippet illustrating the mindset of the "911 truthers" "braintrust" at work. The AMT4SWA comedy show lives on!

Another "couch commander" speaks (just after his daily dose of Faux News!).....LOL! :eek: :eek:

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer says you have been CONNED!!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsrgKOnuznQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peUYj0MS7Ck&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgxktty9IDY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjMHQxKK6fs&feature=related

How about USMC Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CADdbarMD7Q&feature=related

How about Lt.Col. Robert M Bowman PhD........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo7YI2eEJCw&feature=related


No "couch commaders" in this group!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from KingSalmon:

4 black boxes were recovered from Ground Zero, and plenty of witnesses state this.

FBI still claims they found none.

Credible witnesses?

You have any photos or video of the CVRs and or FDRs AT ground zero?

(serious question)

 

[AMT4SWA]

Quote from Lucrum:

Credible witnesses?

You have any photos or video of the CVRs and or FDRs AT ground zero?

(serious question)

This is very common knowledge from MANY eye witnesses. Some of these witnesses have even been interviewed by TV stations/9/11 Investigation programs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqewYask17o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsnI8glYF7o&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNDurCBIqek&feature=related

When you do PROPER due diligence you will find the DETAILS!

 

[DirkDigler]

Quote from AMT4SWA:

Another "couch commander" speaks (just after his daily dose of Faux News!).....LOL! :eek: :eek:

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer says you have been CONNED!!!!!!!
How about USMC Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford.......
How about Lt.Col. Robert M Bowman PhD........

No "couch commaders" in this group!!!!!!!!!!

OK lets try your "logic" on for size. The message I'm getting from you is that Lt. Colonel's with real field experience are credible, trusted sources. So we have:

1 USMC Lt. Col out of over 1,800. That's .05% nutjob, 99.95% sane.
1 US Army Lt col out of over 9,120. That's .01% nutjob, 99.99% sane
1 US Air Force Lt Col out of roughly 650. That's .15% nutjob, 99.85% sane.

Seems to me that those who fall in to the sane category win overwhelmingly. Or am I missing something here?

 

[AMT4SWA]

Quote from DirkDigler:

OK lets try your "logic" on for size. The message I'm getting from you is that Lt. Colonel's with real field experience are credible, trusted sources. So we have:

1 USMC Lt. Col out of over 1,800. That's .05% nutjob, 99.95% sane.
1 US Army Lt col out of over 9,120. That's .01% nutjob, 99.99% sane
1 US Air Force Lt Col out of roughly 650. That's .15% nutjob, 99.85% sane.

Seems to me that those who fall in to the sane category win overwhelmingly. Or am I missing something here?

First off, please REALIZE as a "BELIEF'R" you are in the MINORITY of thought......:eek:

You do know that recent polls show 70% to 80% of Americans say 9/11 official story can't be right and new investigations should take place.......you know that, right?

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/poll_only_16_percent_believe_gov_on_911.htm

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2004/111104cnnpoll.htm

Second point, HELL YES those with OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE know a hell of a lot more to evaluate the 9/11 official story (experience in professional aviation, military service, foreign intelligence, etc). It is so obvious this is the exact type of prior life experience to have proper operational background into various events from 9/11. Those who do not have operational experience, in backgrounds related to the events of 9/11, do not have the same reference point while evaluating details.

 

[AMT4SWA]

Quote from DirkDigler:

So we have:

1 USMC Lt. Col out of over 1,800. That's .05% nutjob, 99.95% sane.
1 US Army Lt col out of over 9,120. That's .01% nutjob, 99.99% sane
1 US Air Force Lt Col out of roughly 650. That's .15% nutjob, 99.85% sane.

Seems to me that those who fall in to the sane category win overwhelmingly. Or am I missing something here?

You CONTINUE to miss a lot! :eek:

U.S. Military Officers for 9/11 Truth........ http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/

Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement,
and Government Officials Question 9/11............. http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Pilots and Aviation Professionals
Question 9/11........ http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

Pilots for 9/11 Truth......... http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

Firefighters for 9/11 Truth........ http://firefightersfor911truth.org/

Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth.......... http://www.ae911truth.org/


Do you see why you are the MINORITY of thought? :eek:

 

[DirkDigler]

Quote from AMT4SWA:

First off, please REALIZE as a "BELIEF'R" you are in the MINORITY of thought......:eek:

You do know that recent polls show 70% to 80% of Americans say 9/11 official story can't be right and new investigations should take place.......you know that, right?

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/poll_only_16_percent_believe_gov_on_911.htm

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2004/111104cnnpoll.htm

Why is it that those numbers can only be found on Alex Jones' web sites?

Quote from AMT4SWA:
Second point, HELL YES those with OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE know a hell of a lot more to evaluate the 9/11 official story (experience in professional aviation, military service, foreign intelligence, etc). It is so obvious this is the exact type of prior life experience to have proper operational background into various events from 9/11. Those who do not have operational experience, in backgrounds related to the events of 9/11, do not have the same reference point while evaluating details. [/B]

I agree! Why is it that less than 0.03% of those experts have come forward? Not 3%, not 0.3%, but 0.03%! have come forward. By any measure that's in the noise, a statistically insignificant quantity.

 

[DirkDigler]

Quote from AMT4SWA:
You CONTINUE to miss a lot! :eek:
U.S. Military Officers for 9/11 Truth........ http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/

14 officers on that site. So relative to my previous post now the percentage is up from 0.03% to 0.09%

Quote from AMT4SWA:
Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement,
and Government Officials Question 9/11............. http://patriotsquestion911.com/

1300 Engineers and Architects on that site. There are 1.5 million Engineers and 233,00 Architects in the US. So that's 0.08% of the total Engineer/Architect population that have come forward.

400 College Professors on that site. There are roughly 500,000 College Professors in the US. So that's 0.08% who have come forward.

400 Health care Professionals on that site. There are roughly 14 million Healthcare Professionals in the US. So that's 0.003% that have come forward.

Quote from AMT4SWA:
Pilots and Aviation Professionals
Question 9/11........ http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html
Pilots for 9/11 Truth......... http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

Roughly 200 pilots on those sites. 110,000 Commercial Pilots in the US. So that's 0.18% who have come forward.

Quote from AMT4SWA:
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth........ http://firefightersfor911truth.org/

Roughly 650 signatures (I only counted real names not those listed as "xxxxxxx") on that site. There are 1,148,800 firefighters in the US. So that's 0.06% who have come forward.

Quote from AMT4SWA:
Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth.......... http://www.ae911truth.org/

Already covered.

Quote from AMT4SWA:
Do you see why you are the MINORITY of thought? :eek:

No, I don't.

 

[denner]

You do realize the reason why more people don't come forward is because of asshat's such as yourself and others who make it their hobby to launch personal insults at anyone who questions the mainstream version of events.

On an anonymous internet board, no big deal...in the real world with names, reputations, careers, pensions, etc. attached to a person who would wish to speak out against this sort of thing, not so easy.

 

[DirkDigler]

Quote from denner:

You do realize the reason why more people don't come forward is because of asshat's such as yourself and others who make it their hobby to launch personal insults at anyone who questions the mainstream version of events.

On an anonymous internet board, no big deal...in the real world with names, reputations, careers, pensions, etc. attached to a person who would wish to speak out against this sort of thing, not so easy.

Asshat? If I had feelings they'd be hurt. My Hobby? Personal insults? Please reply with two items. First show me the number of posts that I have made on this topic relative to the total number of posts I have made, then tell me if this is my hobby. Second please post a link or links where I have launched a personal attack. It is never my intent to do so.

Questioning the public view of an event is one thing, posting copious quantities of unsubstantiated "facts" is quite another.