New NASA Study Shows CO2 causes Cooling

[futurecurrents]

Quote from Eight:

That fc is a real corker! He's holding off a full-scale assault on his bullshit almost single-handedly! And what does the truth matter if you have your agenda in the school system? Indoctrination is the way to the glorious future when all are equal, when workers have lost their chains, when the Pope runs the whole shooting match, when people bow down to science and it's fc minions.. hell yes!

I hope the stupid little bitch gets mugged in an ally and comes away with a really sore ass but that's just me I suppose.

Yeah it's terrible that they teach science in the schools. The Pope runs the shooting match?

You are fucking whacked. See a psychiatrist. You make pisspoor and jerm look sane by comparison, and that's saying something!

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from jem:

NASA says CO2 is a natural thermostat.

and....

"Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space."

so fc you are that the moron drone here.

NASA says co2 is coolant.

So when go bullshiting about science saying something about man made co2... understand that co2 is coolant as well.

Now you have to do the science and the math to figure out the net effect.

Guess what... there is no science showing the net effect in on the earth for CO2 is warming. Further, it is therefore absurd to suggest that science shows man made co2 causes warming.



http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”
That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.
“The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.”
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.

Are you still babbling?

It's a shame. I bet you once had a mind.

But then I guess you had to be a public defender for murderers and rapists and it warped you. Now you have to keep lying and making shit up. So sad. Now you feel you still need to defend the indefensible, and it's made you into a slimy lying scumbag.

Ice pick. In the eye. Shove it in and move it around.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from piezoe:

pspr:

perhaps you had "nuclear fusion" in mind when you said, "... there is no water 'fusion' taking place."

No, there is nothing in his mind but a cartoon of Yosemite Sam jumping up and down, cursing.

That's pretty feeble that he thought you were referring to nuclear fusion. LOL. Now we know why he doesn't understand the very simple concept that more of a greenhouse gas is causing temps to rise.

I'm waiting for him to bring up the Pope as part of the grand AGW conspiracy like the other nutcase here.

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from jem:

piezoe... first of all you seem to be taken this seriously and we can therefore have a real conversation.

secondly I suspect what you have said is correct.
Roy Spencer and some other scientists who question the effect of agw... seem to agree with what you say.

But, there are others who argue... the warming and cooling properties CO2 has cancel each other out in our environment.

But lets go with the other argument.

Arguendo , lets say CO2 does some warming in the troposphere.

The recent science is seems to be showing water vapor and clouds actually have the vast majority of the effect on temps.

And the net effect co2 might have is theoretical and small. again no proof.
And of that potential net effect therefore of man made co2 would most likely have an insignificant effect since it is a small part of the co2 in the atmosphere.

Any science you have showing the above is incorrect will be reviewed.

Careful jem if you keep it up they'll be clamoring to outlaw water and water vapor next.
Of course btw that's part of the respiration process as well so they'll want to tax us on our vo2 max.

 

[pspr]

Quote from futurecurrents:

No, there is nothing in his mind but a cartoon of Yosemite Sam jumping up and down, cursing.

Yes, I can picture you as Yosemite Sam. But I think you are more like Wile E. Coyote with the safe falling on you because that's what you will feel like when it gets colder in the years ahead.

The only question is, will you fade away or will you continue to argue that the cold is caused by global warming? Or will be even more delusional and claim, it would have been worse except for.....

You might as well use that icepick to the eye on yourself, futurecunt, you dumbass, turd swallowing, brotherfucker.

 

[jem]

You have it all to see.

Real Science from NASA becomes babble when fc's mind tries to understand it.

So FC here it is one sentence.... see what Nasa says about CO2 and coolants.



"Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space."


also note.

you are always bringing up that I was a lawyer... I barely bring it up.

but...

I was never a public defender... I was an environmental lawyer volunteering my time for those trying to clean up the san diego bay and other clean water projects.

So I was volunteering my time to protect the environment and your business destroys it.

Quote from futurecurrents:

Are you still babbling?

It's a shame. I bet you once had a mind.

But then I guess you had to be a public defender for murderers and rapists and it warped you. Now you have to keep lying and making shit up. So sad. Now you feel you still need to defend the indefensible, and it's made you into a slimy lying scumbag.

Ice pick. In the eye. Shove it in and move it around.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from jem:

You have it all to see.

Real Science from NASA becomes babble when...

With you it's "real" science when you like what you're reading, and "non" science when you don't--from the very same source.

 

[pspr]

Quote from Ricter:

With you it's "real" science when you like what you're reading, and "non" science when you don't--from the very same source.

That's just bullshit. You are to ignorant to understand the truth when you see it. It is YOU who cannot see the scam that has been presented to you as 'science,' Rectum. You are just too closed minded and outright stupid to understand right from wrong, fact from fiction, truth from lie.

The world has too many morons such as yourself promoting opinion from a deficient mind.

 

[jem]

real science is science based on observation and or testing.

fake science is making assumptions then creating a computer a model that is not tested or proven. And then acting like the computer model proves something.

Then when the models fail... continue with the bullshit about co2 causing warming on earth -- without a shred of scientific evidence.

If I am lying... produce the science that shows co2 causes warming on earth.

Quote from Ricter:

With you it's "real" science when you like what you're reading, and "non" science when you don't--from the very same source.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from jem:


If I am lying... produce the science that shows co2 causes warming on earth.

You've been shown a thousand times. Everything from spectrographic analysis showing reduction of transmission at the wavelengths for CO2 to historical charts that show CO2 and temperatures in lock step. The temp swings seen in the past could only have been because of CO2 accentuating the small solar changes.

The science behind the greenhouse effect of CO2 is about as solid as science gets.

As Richter points out above, you only see the science that seems to support your batshit crazy position.

See your doctor about changing your meds. The one's you're on now aren't working.

This goes for pisspoor also. You guys are just fucking nuts, or crazed ideologues, same thing.