New NASA Study Shows CO2 causes Cooling

[VVV1234]

First of all, the study does not say what the author of the article referenced by Jem attempts to make it say. Its a fatuous distortion of the Nasa paper.

The Thermosphere starts at 120 km above the earth and extends to 600km where CO2 acts to repel certain energetic particles. However, CO2 acts as a greenhouse gas at lower altitudes, effectively serving as an insulator.

How anyone could wave this article around and declare that it contradicts
the view that CO2 is a greenhouse gas is beyond me. I think Jem must be out of work, like pspr, and in a deranged and deluded downward spiral. Or, he is just trying to fuck with Stu and Futurecurrents.

 

[jem]

What are you talking about... I referenced the NASA study in my second post... which was made at virtually the same time as the first post.

I read the stories and then presented quotes and links.

What the nasa story shows is that CO2 acts as a thermostat in our atmosphere....

are you disputing that fact.

Quote from VVV1234:

First of all, the study does not say what the author of the article referenced by Jem attempts to make it say. Its a fatuous distortion of the Nasa paper.

The Thermosphere starts at 120 km above the earth and extends to 600km where CO2 acts to repel certain energetic particles. However, CO2 acts as a greenhouse gas at lower altitudes, effectively serving as an insulator.

How anyone could wave this article around and declare that it contradicts
the view that CO2 is a greenhouse gas is beyond me. I think Jem must be out of work, like pspr, and in a deranged and deluded downward spiral. Or, he is just trying to fuck with Stu and Futurecurrents.

 

[jem]

With respect to the other 2 quotes on the front page... if you wish to dispute that man made CO2 has a net cooling effect...

lets see you do it. your biggest hurdle will be to show that Co2 and then man made CO2 plays a significant part of the warming caused by greenhouse gases in the troposphere.

Which is why I have been asking the leftists here to link to science showing man made co2 causes warming on earth.

finally leftist drone... why are you pulling that strawman bullshit.
I did not dispute the fact CO2 is a greenhouse gas... just more misdirection deflection and lack of science from the left.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:
I might link to a study such as ... see my quote below from the front page of this thread...

Nevermind you might...you did. You tend to link to bullshit that way . You're a denier, an eccentric, a winger. What else would you do.

I've noticed how there is nothing you like more than starting off posting something that is horseshit wrong.

 

[stu]

Quote from murray t turtle:

==================
Well maybe they saw some 1970's news stories;
scary cooling trend Let see , old global warming scam,new cooling trend.

Perhaps one of the better solutions, is like the founder of the weather channel said- sue algore for fraud.

Well that clinches it.
You're crap is formally confirmed as totally fucked. murry t turtle likes it.

 

[jem]

I was answering a hypothetical you leftist troll. The point you just made you sock puppet is worthless again.

Quote from stu:

Nevermind you might...you did. You tend to link to bullshit that way . You're a denier, an eccentric, a winger. What else would you do.

I've noticed how there is nothing you like more than starting off posting something that is horseshit wrong.

 

[stu]

Quote from VVV1234:

First of all, the study does not say what the author of the article referenced by Jem attempts to make it say. Its a fatuous distortion of the Nasa paper.

The Thermosphere starts at 120 km above the earth and extends to 600km where CO2 acts to repel certain energetic particles. However, CO2 acts as a greenhouse gas at lower altitudes, effectively serving as an insulator.

How anyone could wave this article around and declare that it contradicts
the view that CO2 is a greenhouse gas is beyond me. I think Jem must be out of work, like pspr, and in a deranged and deluded downward spiral. Or, he is just trying to fuck with Stu and Futurecurrents.

Very true.
But then Jem is prone to be sucked in by that sort of purposeful confusion designed to appeal to let's say, the less scrupulous with certain political persuasions and weird beliefs, like Jem and pspr.

 

[jem]

hey look its sock puppets having conversation with each other avoiding the main point... that leftists have no science supporting their argument that man made co2 causes warming and mis directing and deflecting with straw men.

Just as predicted.

(and yes stu for a short time I posted on work computer under a different name and let people know it was me... so you are not going to able to distract us with your sock puppet crap. )
==============================================
Quote from VVV1234:

First of all, the study does not say what the author of the article referenced by Jem attempts to make it say. Its a fatuous distortion of the Nasa paper.

The Thermosphere starts at 120 km above the earth and extends to 600km where CO2 acts to repel certain energetic particles. However, CO2 acts as a greenhouse gas at lower altitudes, effectively serving as an insulator.

How anyone could wave this article around and declare that it contradicts
the view that CO2 is a greenhouse gas is beyond me. I think Jem must be out of work, like pspr, and in a deranged and deluded downward spiral. Or, he is just trying to fuck with Stu and Futurecurrents.


Very true.
But then Jem is prone to be sucked in by that sort of purposeful confusion designed to appeal to let's say, the less scrupulous with certain political persuasions and weird beliefs, like Jem and pspr.

 

[pspr]

Looks like Big Al has expanded his employed posters on ET from one to three.

What do you guys get paid? Are you paid by the post, like a penny a post or do you get paid like $10 a day?

I would have guessed higher but even Al Gore isn't stupid enough to pay morons like you guys any more than that.

 

[jem]

5. I will hit these one at a time going backwards....


your last one is the joke we have been referencing...

it does not say man made CO2 causes warming... it takes a sample of pro global warming authors and even they say man made activities not man made co2.


Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

4. no science..... in fact a link to the IPPC report which modeled projections not predictions and whose model is failing because we are cooling or staying the same instead of warming... even though co2 is still increasing.

3. shows high co2 level but no science showing CO2 causing warmth.

I will get to 2 and 1 tomorrow.

Quote from futurecurrents:

OK then, here you go. Feel free to ignore this also. I'm sure you will.


http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect.htm

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cmb-faq/globalwarming.html

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence

http://climate.nasa.gov/causes

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus