New NASA Study Shows CO2 causes Cooling

[gwb-trading]

Quote from stu:


You posted bullshit and set it as a standard to be taken as valid. Otherwise why post it at all, you idiot.

It appears that you have no valid facts to back your assertions.... and all you can post is insults.

 

[jem]

here is the second post from this thread...
see that down there..

that is a quote from NASA.

Quote from jem:

The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA’s own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming. As illustrated by data collected using Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER), both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth’s upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it. - See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/glob...-cools-atmosphere_052013#sthash.g1kdZIFl.dpuf

Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”
That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

 

[stu]

Quote from gwb-trading:

It appears that you have no valid facts to back your assertions.... and all you can post is insults.

Pay more attention then you might recognize a valid fact when it smacks you in the face.

Funny how you don't see the instigation of insults by deniers.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

here is the second post from this thread...
see that down there..

that is a quote from NASA.

So? What are you trying to suggest by it?
Twisting the facts about solar flares and the reaction of the upper atmosphere doesn't support non-climate change.


"both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth’s upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it."

So conversely, the nutters at Denier Central are suggesting any marked reduction in the amount of 'heating energy' being absorbed and reaching Earth because of more CO2/greenhouse gases, would be a good thing.

You didn't think this through did you.
No surprise there.

 

[pspr]

You got you butt beat every day in the God thread. Face it bud, you're just not bright enough to discuss these subjects.

Let me give you a clue since you don't seem to have any facts or science to rely upon.

<font size=4 color=red><b>“The influence of mankind on climate is trivially true and numerically insignificant.”</b>
~Richard Lindzen, MIT Atmospheric Physicist
</font>

Stick that up your ass you STUpid asshole.

Quote from stu:

You wish I lost the god debate but that's just one of your very few attributes, wishful thinking.

The OP makes a reliance on NASA science, which ironically is not NASA science. I've posted what NASA science does clearly state. You want me to post it again?

• "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived "forcing" of climate change. "

You're trying to say CO2 is NOT forcing climate change and climate change is NOT global warming? Come on cat's out the bag. It's clear you're not all there, you may as well directly deny the 'NASA science' too.

You're a compulsive obsessive angry troll posting all day every day and starting thread after thread. If you're not being paid you have to be dumber than a bag of hammers anyway. No wonder you and jem are attracted to each other.

No need to go fuck yourself though , you're already fucked.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from gwb-trading:

It appears that you have no valid facts to back your assertions.... and all you can post is insults.

The other biggest idiot speaks. You make jerm and pisspoor look intelligent and sane by comparison.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from jem:



Whose model has now been discredited because as shown above we have not warmed for the last 17 years even the CO2 levels have gone up and that model was predicting warming.

And this is patently false and you know it you fucking lying piece of shit.

If you don't know it, you're even dumber and more insane than I thought.

Kill yourself now. Do the world a favor. Take pisspoor and that moron gwb with you.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from stu:

You've been shown what NASA states about human CO2 and climate change. You made 'NASA science' the standard with an OP.
You're denying NASA science. You're a denier. The science doesn't matter to you.



You wish I lost the god debate but that's just one of your very few attributes, wishful thinking.

The OP makes a reliance on NASA science, which ironically is not NASA science. I've posted what NASA science does clearly state. You want me to post it again?

• "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived "forcing" of climate change. "

You're trying to say CO2 is NOT forcing climate change and climate change is NOT global warming? Come on cat's out the bag. It's clear you're not all there, you may as well directly deny the 'NASA science' too.

You're a compulsive obsessive angry troll posting all day every day and starting thread after thread. If you're not being paid you have to be dumber than a bag of hammers anyway. No wonder you and jem are attracted to each other.

No need to go fuck yourself though , you're already fucked.

+1 Really really fucked in the head.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from futurecurrents:

+1 Really really fucked in the head.

I think jem may "work" for the site owner, drumming up page hits. Advertisers don't know that a large percentage of ET's page hits are down here in the basement, they just think the site's popular.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Ricter:

I think jem may "work" for the site owner, drumming up page hits. Advertisers don't know that a large percentage of ET's page hits are down here in the basement, they just think the site's popular.

Really? And all this time I thought you and futurecunts "worked" for the site owner drumming up page hits.