New DNC Chair Says Outrage Over Clinton's Pay-To-Play Is Attempt To "Criminalize Normal Behavior"

[Banjo]

Yesterday, Donna Brazile, the new DNC Chair, appeared on ABC's "This Week"

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero)

 

[bullmarket79]

Oh well I suppose Hillary will put Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the Supreme Court if she wins to pay back for the favors.

 

[CaptainObvious]

No, it's an attempt to expose criminal behavior that has been accepted as normal.

 

[achilles28]

She exposed secrets in exchange for cash. Her email server was a drop box. The foundation, and it's subsidiaries disperse payments. She's a traitor. It's all covered in the espionage, state secrets and treason Act's.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Where's the "pay-to-play" part, aside from the feverish imaginings of her frothy opponents?

 

[Spike Trader]

She exposed secrets in exchange for cash. Her email server was a drop box. The foundation, and it's subsidiaries disperse payments. She's a traitor. It's all covered in the espionage, state secrets and treason Act's.

And yet Trey Gowdy can't seem to be able to nail her ,

with so many investigations under his belt ,

the guy must be a real idiot.

 

[fhl]

In this instance, how is “paying for a speech” any different than “giving a bribe”?
In November 2011, a Swedish telecom company called Ericsson paid Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s husband, Bill Clinton, $750,000 for giving a speech. In April 2012, Obama signed an executive order which placed sanctions on telecom sales to Iran and Syria. However, Ericsson was given an exemption from these sanctions.

In this instance, how is “paying for a speech” any different than “giving a bribe”?