Most people at my firm who traded like that left in 2009-2012. They are just not making money anymore.
No kidding.
Most people at my firm who traded like that left in 2009-2012. They are just not making money anymore.
True, but trading a "system" without even knowing its average profit (loss?) per trade, its maximum drawdown and its return on investment (if any) is beyond stupidity.
Would you buy a used car without even test-driving it?
Who said anything about trading a system?
Whatever.
I'm serious, this thread seems to point out a misunderstanding of newer traders thinking you need to create a system, then backtest to be successful which isn't true at all. In fact I don't think any of the profitable traders I know rely on backtesting whatsoever.
Are the books teaching this? Why does everyone think this is how you trade?
I'm serious, this thread seems to point out a misunderstanding of newer traders thinking you need to create a system, then backtest to be successful which isn't true at all. In fact I don't think any of the profitable traders I know rely on backtesting whatsoever.
Are the books teaching this? Why does everyone think this is how you trade?
I forward test anything new, trading very small with tight risk control. If it works I increase size, if not it gets tossed out.
In other words you prefer to risk your money immediately on new, un-proven trading systems instead of testing them with historical data first and THEN trading them, if they are indeed profitable and do not generate huge drawdowns.
Do you have ANY idea how much money you could lose with that type of I-prefer-to-trade-immediately-and-worry-about-the-results-later trading style?
What if you lose 50 grand that way before finally finding a (mediocre) "winning" trading system that returns 4.2% a year before taxes?
Yup, that's right. What's that stuff about past results being no guarantee of future performance?