New Book Launch

[marketsurfer]

Quote from sjfan:

Could you make sure you write it with words, not web designs, please?

Start with the premise of abundance instead of scarcity, add games of chance.....then


Fortunism and the ‘Fellowship of Fortuna’ are a body of teachings, a philosophy, and a contemporary way of living. The basic principles of this movement are ground in the assumption that chance or luck is the one and only trait that all people of our diverse world hold in common. As a result, the phenomenon of chance provides a platform from which human beings can unify, learn and grow. The realization of this potential for global harmony is the primary aim of the Fellowship’s teachings and practices.

 

[morganist]

Quote from sjfan:

Or just email it to me....

Not going to happen. Also in terms of review. It has been read by some of the most influencial economists in my country. And well received.

 

[sjfan]

Okay - then just say so. No need to hide behind a 'web designer.'

Who reviewed it? What did they say?

Quote from morganist:

Not going to happen. Also in terms of review. It has been read by some of the most influencial economists in my country. And well received.

 

[morganist]

Quote from marketsurfer:

Start with the premise of abundance instead of scarcity, add games of chance.....then


Fortunism and the ‘Fellowship of Fortuna’ are a body of teachings, a philosophy, and a contemporary way of living. The basic principles of this movement are ground in the assumption that chance or luck is the one and only trait that all people of our diverse world hold in common. As a result, the phenomenon of chance provides a platform from which human beings can unify, learn and grow. The realization of this potential for global harmony is the primary aim of the Fellowship’s teachings and practices.

I'll have a look at it. But I don't think I will like it.

 

[marketsurfer]

No problem. Its more of a philosophy, but I like thinking about applying it to economics.

Even though I realize that's mostly fantasy.

 

[sjfan]

Morganist - resorting to deleting my post I see - that really shows what kind of character you are

Quote from morganist:

I'll have a look at it. But I don't think I will like it.

 

[morganist]

Quote from sjfan:

Morganist - resorting to deleting my post I see - that really shows what kind of character you are

You made a reference to a personal message I sent you on a public forum. That really shows what kind of character you are.

Incidentally that is standard practice for a moderator to remove private data which has been publically displayed on an open forum. This is not detrimental to my character of role as a moderator. It is simply the standard practice against your infringement of the sites privacy rules.

 

[sjfan]

There's nothing public about that PM. There was no personal information. It's just your view. Your view is damaging - but you shouldn't be shielded from that.

PMs are not privileged. There's no implied confidentiality when you send me a message. It's been posted before.

Quote from morganist:

You made a reference to a personal message I sent you on a public forum. That really shows what kind of character you are.

Incidentally that is standard practice for a moderator to remove private data which has been publically displayed on an open forum. This is not detrimental to my character of role as a moderator. It is simply the standard practice against your infringement of the sites privacy rules.

 

[morganist]

Quote from sjfan:

There's nothing public about that PM. There was no personal information. It's just your view. Your view is damaging - but you shouldn't be shielded from that.

PMs are not privileged. There's no implied confidentiality when you send me a message. It's been posted before.

This is completely untrue. There is a confidenciality involved in PM's. That is why they are called Personal Messages. I am a moderator I understand this better than you.

If you want ask Joe or Baron. It is simply wrong. Both personally and according to site policy to post personal messages on the forum.

 

[sjfan]

I don't see anything in the conduct rules. And yes, I have posted a thread in feedback requesting baron to clarify how whether it's kosher for a moderate to delete a post critical of that moderator.

Dude, ease up. This is a message board for god's sake. There's no confidentiality when it comes to a freaking message board personal message (I certainly haven't agreed to any).

Quote from morganist:

This is completely untrue. There is a confidenciality involved in PM's. That is why they are called Personal Messages. I am a moderator I understand this better than you.

If you want ask Joe or Baron. It is simply wrong. Both personally and according to site policy to post personal messages on the forum.