Never let a profit turn into a loss. (Good or bad advice)?

Quote from gifropan:

Never let a profit turn into a loss. On the face of it, this looks like very sound advice. However I find quite often adhering to this rule costs me money although I am right about the direction of the market. Here is a scenario as an example.

Go long at 37 stop at 31 profit target 47
market gets to 42 move stop to 37
Market comes back stopped out at break even
market makes new high, buy at 43 stop at 37 profit target 53
market makes 48, move stop to 43, get stopped out then market continues to make another new high.

This can happen a number of times so that I end up buying the market higher and higher. The market moves way beyond my original profit target but never the less I close trades at break even a number of times until the last one gets stopped out with a loss.

Is there something wrong with this supposedly golden rule of trading or am I doing something very wrong. I, obviously, am since I find myself very often on the right side of the market and still end up loosing money.

Can anyone tell me where I am going wrong

Thanks

I'd say you are making two mistakes. One, you are sitting there passively, letting a ~15% profit go to b/e. The b/e stop is a great idea, but it is a failsafe, not the routine way to exit a trade. Two, any profit target is inherently arbitrary. Who are you to say the market will reach that point? Once you are in a trade, you have to be alert for signs that it is no longer working. That's when you exit, not when you get to b/e or your target.
 
It's neither good nor bad advice, it's silly and meaningless advice.

Exits should be defined in the context of your strategy. Almost all losers will show gain at some point and most winners will show a loss at some point. I don't see why you'd want to trade the noise around the zero line.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

...any profit target is inherently arbitrary. Who are you to say the market will reach that point?
Now why aren't you as insightful in your political commentary? :D
 
Quote from gifropan:

Never let a profit turn into a loss. On the face of it, this looks like very sound advice. However I find quite often adhering to this rule costs me money although I am right about the direction of the market. Here is a scenario as an example.

Go long at 37 stop at 31 profit target 47
market gets to 42 move stop to 37
Market comes back stopped out at break even
market makes new high, buy at 43 stop at 37 profit target 53
market makes 48, move stop to 43, get stopped out then market continues to make another new high.

This can happen a number of times so that I end up buying the market higher and higher. The market moves way beyond my original profit target but never the less I close trades at break even a number of times until the last one gets stopped out with a loss.

Is there something wrong with this supposedly golden rule of trading or am I doing something very wrong. I, obviously, am since I find myself very often on the right side of the market and still end up loosing money.

Can anyone tell me where I am going wrong

Thanks

First of all, rules dont' work 100% of the time. Therefore, when you say the following...

...this can happen a number of times...

You need to sit down and statistically determine how often such does happen to determine if it merits a change in your trade management after entry. If it doesn't merit a change...leave it alone and learn to live with it when that situation happens again.

With that said, you can then do any of the following:

* 1 - Design a re-entry signal near the price your trailing stop if/when the trailing stop is hit.

* 2 - Learn to recognize and then take action (don't freeze like a deer in the road while staring at approaching headlights) when the price action is reversing prior to reaching your profit target so that you can exit early (prior) to the trailing stop is hit and then do *1.

* 3 - Set your trailing stops with scale outs.

Mark
 
Scaling out makes your broker richer. Let's say you trade 500 times/year on 100 positions. You scale in and out 5x per position. Over 100 positions, what does all of that scaling accomplish? Over your total portfolio, the scaling will simply cancel itself out.
 
As for the criticism of pyramiding -- that's why it works, because it's counterintuitive. If it were intuitive, everybody would be doing it, and it wouldn't work.
 
Quote from gifropan:

Here is a scenario as an example.

Go long at 37 stop at 31 profit target 47
market gets to 42 move stop to 37
Market comes back stopped out at break even
market makes new high, buy at 43 stop at 37 profit target 53
market makes 48, move stop to 43, get stopped out then market continues to make another new high.

So you've entered at 37, it moves to 42, you go to about BE and it stops you out. What prevents you from re-entering when it hits 37 with your same stop? You liked it before at 37, so unless your analysis has changed, why not jump back in? You're basically back at square one and out 2 commissions, which is peanuts if your desired move materializes. If it happens a couple times, then perhaps you might want to wait for the next setup, but taking one or two extra shots might well be worth it.
 
Quote from billyjoerob:

As for the criticism of pyramiding -- that's why it works, because it's counterintuitive. If it were intuitive, everybody would be doing it, and it wouldn't work.
"Counterintuitive?" Is that all you got? Walking in front of a bus is also counterintuitive. Unless the R:R at time of pyramid entry tests to be adequate and acceptable for a specific trading method, you're just spinning whole cloth with platitude.
 
Quote from billyjoerob:

Scaling out makes your broker richer. Let's say you trade 500 times/year on 100 positions. You scale in and out 5x per position. Over 100 positions, what does all of that scaling accomplish? Over your total portfolio, the scaling will simply cancel itself out.
What does a bushel of arbitrary assumptions go for these days? :D
 
Pyramiding is simply the inverse of doubling down. Doubling down doesn't work for the same reason pyramiding does, because trends tend to continue.
 
Back
Top