Yeah, Lucrum had already covered Obama on his sissy bike. But we didn't get the Bush comparison.Quote from 377OHMS:
lol your forgot this one:
![]()
![]()
Quote from pspr:
Yeah, Lucrum had already covered Obama on his sissy bike. But we didn't get the Bush comparison.
On Israel/Iran. I don't think Israel will let Iran get a nuke without an overt strike to take out something. The centrifuges, other sites or the Iranian leadership - but something.
If they think Obama is going to win re-election it will happen October 15, 2012 (my best guess). If not, then they will think they have time for Romney to draw that red line early next year.
I agree with you on Obama. But I think I read that they have a way to get their bunker busters on existing planes. They don't have the latest big bunker buster but they have some they can fit on some planes. Plus, they have some ground to ground missiles. And, I don't hear the desenters in the Israeli government making desenting statements anymore either. I think they have a plan and they're just waiting for a decision to go or wait for Romney.Quote from 377OHMS:
Israel has no heavy bombers. You can't take out the military, leadership or nuclear program of a country of 75 million people using fighters and Strike Eagles (F-15i is a variant of the F-15e Strike Eagle). Israel just can't carry enough bombs to do the job:
12 x 500 lb Mk82 slicks
600 USG Centerline drop tank
LANTIRN pods
4 x AIM-9M Sidewinder AAMs
They simply aren't equipped and I predict that Israel will *not* unilaterally attack Iran. They'll attempt to shame the US into attacking but I don't believe Obama is going to lift a finger. Essentially nothing is going to be done and Iran will develop nuclear weapons and manage to integrate them onto their ballistic missiles. This is a school-yard shoving match and nothing more.
I thought we were talking about having balls.Quote from AK Forty Seven:
The list of senior terrorists killed during the Obama presidency is fairly extensive.