Neo cons, Cucks Have Trump Derangement Syndrome Contest

45_wall_01.jpg-h_2017.jpg
 
jem said:
I am so proud, today, for the first time first time in my daughter's life she has a president and presumably a first lady who care about her future.
More...

I bet outside of your influence she doesn't like Trump at all. No young woman with decent self respect and awareness would. This goes way beyond political parties, the man doesn't respect women; he picks up trophy wives only to dump them when he loses interest. With respect to the first lady, she's no role model at all for intelligent, independent woman. Ivanka maybe. My daughter who is already fairly successful in her career at age 23 and an independent thinker can't stand Trump and seemed to like Bernie Sanders. I don't follow US politics enough to know the reasons, beyond Trump's more obvious negative attributes.
 
Last edited:
even if what you stated is accurate... what I stated is still true.
Clinton and Obama are globalists. Not interested in the welfare of anyone in the states but the cronies.

Nine_Ender said:
I bet outside of your influence she doesn't like Trump at all. No young woman with decent self respect and awareness would. This goes way beyond political parties, the man doesn't respect women; he picks up trophy wives only to dump them when he loses interest. With respect to the first lady, she's no role model at all for intelligent, independent woman. Ivanka maybe. My daughter who is already fairly successful in her career at age 23 and an independent thinker can't stand Trump and seemed to like Bernie Sanders. I don't follow US politics enough to know the reasons, beyond Trump's more obvious negative attributes.
More...
 
I am a little disappointed in the Trump Derangement Syndrome entries from the cucks and loser NeverTrumpers. George Will had a dispirited column in the WashPost today that droned on about Trump's speech but it was so fucking boring I didn't finish reading it. I doubt he knows how to use twitter. Or email. Kathleen Parker, their RINO columnist, had some hyperbolic rant, but she is not important enough to quote. I will check David Brooks, he's usually good for a laugh. OK, here's Brooks' typically smug take:

"We’ve never had a major national leader as professionally unprepared, intellectually ill informed, morally compromised and temperamentally unfit as the man taking the oath on Friday. So let’s not lessen the shock factor that should reverberate across this extraordinary moment." https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/20/...on.html?smid=tw-nytdavidbrooks&smtyp=cur&_r=0

Luckily, our celebrities have picked up the slack, and following their leader Meryl Streep, have gone on an orgy of self-pity and totally tasteless attacks. My fave came from TV talking slut Chelsea Handler:

Chelsea Handler

✔ @chelseahandler


Once or twice in every generation a line is crossed so egregiously that where you stood on the issue will forever define you. -Kara Vallow

Haha she may be right but not in the way she imagines.

Then there is homo activist George Takei, still living off a 50 year old TV show.

George TakeiVerified account‏@GeorgeTakei Jan 20


The White House removed its climate change web page. And the healthcare, civil rights and LGBT sections. Just thought you should know.

Yes, George, we call that "winning."
More outrage from George:


  • George Takei‏@GeorgeTakei 20h20 hours ago


    Replying to Paige Dimakos and Jane McManus
    They put up new web pages already though, including one on supporting law enforcement. His massage is clear.

    I think he means "message" but with this crowd, who can be sure. So supporting law enforcement is somehow ominous, but Obama putting targets on their backs was laudable? Ok, got it
 
Last edited:
No mocking of crazed leftists would be complete without Jane Fonda. I actually didn't realize she was still alive but apparently she is, longing for her glory days mounting an AA gun in North Vietnam and fantasizing about shooting down American fliers.

Huffington PostVerified account‏@HuffingtonPost 12h12 hours ago

Jane Fonda says celebrities must still speak out against "predator-in-chief" Trump http://huff.to/2iMv1tCpic.twitter.com/xx0Re6s3ad

C2rs1R6WgAA9RQy.jpg


Funny, she never had a problem when Bill Clinton was assaulting women in the Oval Office.
 
So today we have a million plus angry women marching in several cities. Too bad they were so uninspired by Hillary. All this proves that had the DNC and their media minions not colluded to rig a primary and nominate a criminally corrupt political hack, just about anyone else would have won the election. Apparently bitching about it is easier to do than make the necessary admissions of such a monumental screw up.
 
CaptainObvious said:
So today we have a million plus angry women marching in several cities. Too bad they were so uninspired by Hillary. All this proves that had the DNC and their media minions not colluded to rig a primary and nominate a criminally corrupt political hack, just about anyone else would have won the election. Apparently bitching about it is easier to do than make the necessary admissions of such a monumental screw up.
More...

I'm not so sure. They might have received more votes in states they won anyway.

I also recall pundits saying that Trump was sure to lose but if the republicans had just nominated someone plausible, they would win easily.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top