
How could you possibly hope to find out exactly what his proprietary models are or were? Do you expect him to share them with you? And if not, then what is your point?Quote from nitro:
If I may, let me propose something.
1) First, we must assume VN is not dumb.
2) Assume VN was not gambling, and that his position was trading some edge.
What I am trying to say is, give the man credit, and learn from it. If those two assumptions are true, there is much to be learned. For example, here is a crucial insight into option markets: If there are no jumps, you can arb vol.
Did VNs model neglect jumps, or did his model give them an extremely unlikely probability? What was his model? Was it stochastic vol model, local vol model, Heston? etc etc etc?
nitro
Quote from nitro:
If I may, let me propose something.
1) First, we must assume VN is not dumb.
2) Assume VN was not gambling, and that his position was trading some edge.
What I am trying to say is, give the man credit, and learn from it. If those two assumptions are true, there is much to be learned. For example, here is a crucial insight into option markets: If there are no jumps, you can arb vol.
Did VNs model neglect jumps, or did his model give them an extremely unlikely probability? What was his model? Was it stochastic vol model, local vol model, Heston? etc etc etc?
nitro
I agree that we are not likely to know any of these things, because VN is not LTCM and there won't be any investigation.Quote from Thunderdog:
How could you possibly hope to find out exactly what his proprietary models are or were? Do you expect him to share them with you? And if not, then what is your point?
"Casting dispersions?" Dispersions? You're quite the journalist, aren't you? May I recommend a remedial English class? That and an occasional spell check, Mr. Pulitzer.Quote from marketsurfer:
what on earth is that supposed to mean? other than a misguided attempt at casting dispersions and walloqing in falsehoods.