<i>"I can understand the allure of seeing that $25 million credit hit the run, but how many times must he blowup to understand it's not a viable strategy? These things aren't binary, and they're marked to market."</i>
That guy is the John Daly, not hardly Tiger Woods of the hedge fund world.
So Vic made huge gains, blew up and made huge gains again in the past. Became the #1 ranked on whatever scale in the world along the way. BFD. That is/was all done with an unsustainable approach.
Two things are certain in selling naked puts in all market conditions:
#1: Huge gains will be enjoyed during sideways to upward market periods. Those gains can easily out-perform any other approach during favorable conditions.
#2: Most or all gains will be lost (with certainty) during brief to extended market corrections.
In other words, the odds are high of outsized positive performance for awhile. It is summarily guaranteed that most or all funds (if not outright deficit) will result sooner than later.
*
Where is the genius in that approach? Just about anyone here can learn to run that gamut of boom & bust, no mystery or aura exists there.
Doesn't matter how high an IQ one has, stubbornly playing longside only thru all market conditions while <b>heavily leveraged</b> is just stone stupid. Anyone who persists in negotiating that inevitable cycle is just stone stupid, fund manager and investors alike.
Period, end of story.
That guy is the John Daly, not hardly Tiger Woods of the hedge fund world.
So Vic made huge gains, blew up and made huge gains again in the past. Became the #1 ranked on whatever scale in the world along the way. BFD. That is/was all done with an unsustainable approach.
Two things are certain in selling naked puts in all market conditions:
#1: Huge gains will be enjoyed during sideways to upward market periods. Those gains can easily out-perform any other approach during favorable conditions.
#2: Most or all gains will be lost (with certainty) during brief to extended market corrections.
In other words, the odds are high of outsized positive performance for awhile. It is summarily guaranteed that most or all funds (if not outright deficit) will result sooner than later.
*
Where is the genius in that approach? Just about anyone here can learn to run that gamut of boom & bust, no mystery or aura exists there.
Doesn't matter how high an IQ one has, stubbornly playing longside only thru all market conditions while <b>heavily leveraged</b> is just stone stupid. Anyone who persists in negotiating that inevitable cycle is just stone stupid, fund manager and investors alike.
Period, end of story.

