Negative Leverage trap question

Quote from winstontj:

FAS is the long part. Both FAS & FAZ had a price of $60 at inception back on election day (they launched that week/day). If you had shorted both at $60 you would be up ~$40 on FAS and even/slight loss on FAZ.

Nice to see that IB had shares. They may get snatched up but you never know. I don't know if the shares outstanding is a public thing or not...

I'll have to set up a new monitor page on IB now. Thanks for the tip. Owe you one.
 
Quote from nravo:

I'll have to set up a new monitor page on IB now. Thanks for the tip. Owe you one.

hey you don't owe me anything :D just be careful because its one thing to short the pair at an even NAV/price but now at different prices a 1% move means a different $ amount on either side. If the market goes down 5% FAZ is up 15% on a $60 NAV while FAS goes down 15% on a $10 NAV - i'm not trying to reccomend this - just do all the math to make sure that you are weighted evenly on both sides of the pair...
 
Quote from winstontj:

hey you don't owe me anything :D just be careful because its one thing to short the pair at an even NAV/price but now at different prices a 1% move means a different $ amount on either side. If the market goes down 5% FAZ is up 15% on a $60 NAV while FAS goes down 15% on a $10 NAV - i'm not trying to reccomend this - just do all the math to make sure that you are weighted evenly on both sides of the pair...

I hear you. Btw, know off hand if there are options on these with any decent liquidity?
 
Options are getting there - there are plenty of options on the 2x ETFs but 3x will take some time. I assume that the higher volume 3x ETFs will be a better bet.
 
You might want to look at the UYG/SKF pair of funds to see how these things move long term. SKF has not eroded over time, it started out at $60 and hasn't been near that in quite some time.

I'm not saying this can't be profitable, it just might not be as much as a no-brainer as it seems when some of these ETFs start spiking.
 
Quote from Susannah:

You might want to look at the UYG/SKF pair of funds to see how these things move long term. SKF has not eroded over time, it started out at $60 and hasn't been near that in quite some time.

I'm not saying this can't be profitable, it just might not be as much as a no-brainer as it seems when some of these ETFs start spiking.

Agreed, it's not a no brainer. But there does seem to be a bias to the downside on these animals, even the bull ones, that can in many cases be exploited with a decent probability of success over time. I bet some finance academic types are already modeling this and working on papers about it. And in a year or two, we'll see papers about the great ETF rip-off.

(And yes, I know the offerers say these are not intended for long-term positions. but people are basically idiots, especially most people in the market, and they are just exploiting that stupidity. The American Way.)
 
Quote from nravo:

Agreed, it's not a no brainer. But there does seem to be a bias to the downside on these animals, even the bull ones, that can in many cases be exploited with a decent probability of success over time. I bet some finance academic types are already modeling this and working on papers about it. And in a year or two, we'll see papers about the great ETF rip-off.

(And yes, I know the offerers say these are not intended for long-term positions. but people are basically idiots, especially most people in the market, and they are just exploiting that stupidity. The American Way.)

nravo - i agree. They to tend to "decay" or lose value due to compounding. If you had shorted FAS/FAZ as a pair at $60 which was their NAV at inception (back on election day in November) you would be up $60/pair on that short.

We know what these things are - unfortunatley you can't educate everyone but there is demand for cheap leverage out there.

In my opinion, the biggest problem is "performance chasers". I wish that we did not publish any performance data because what happens is people see up 60% YTD and get in right before a huge sell off, etc. They are intended for short term investments, hedges, etc. - even holding overnight is a huge risk.
 
Quote from winstontj:

nravo - i agree. They to tend to "decay" or lose value due to compounding. If you had shorted FAS/FAZ as a pair at $60 which was their NAV at inception (back on election day in November) you would be up $60/pair on that short.

We know what these things are - unfortunatley you can't educate everyone but there is demand for cheap leverage out there.

In my opinion, the biggest problem is "performance chasers". I wish that we did not publish any performance data because what happens is people see up 60% YTD and get in right before a huge sell off, etc. They are intended for short term investments, hedges, etc. - even holding overnight is a huge risk.

I wonder if there is a consistent play by simply shorting MOC, if that is possible, and then buying back on the pricing the next day, or something like that, simply exploiting the overnight repricings, forgetting the intra-day.
 
I've simulated this and you have a good chance of making a small profit, a fair chance of making a larger profit and a small chance of losing a lot. Also, balancing both sides so you start with roughly the same $ amounts will reduce your risk and increase potential profit.
Quote from nravo:

Long term, is there any reason to hold a 2X or 3X ETF, long or short? Let's say, no. So given that (with a few exceptions) it's not a good idea to hold them long term, because of the leveraged negative compounding on down days, why not just short them long term, and let them dissolve. Caveats?
 
Quote from Trader666:

I've simulated this and you have a good chance of making a small profit, a fair chance of making a larger profit and a small chance of losing a lot. Also, balancing both sides so you start with roughly the same $ amounts will reduce your risk and increase potential profit.

Couldn't get several 2X and 3X shorts filled at IB today. I think the world is getting hip to this.
 
Back
Top