Science does have tons of evidence though which is why the consensus among the experts is 97% and no science organization in the world disputes it.
You're too angry Jem and comparatively recently have developed yourself into a fully fledged irrational troll. You teach me...yeah sure, well here's something I'll teach you. Evolution is not about the origins of life. I'm not going to waste time on you. Once you learn the basics, get back to me.
science has no proof showing man made co2 is on net warming the earth.
That's true.
ok... we have 2 amazing admissions in one day.
So we agree agw is speculation that we can not prove or disprove at the moment.
No of course we cannot prove it. Science never proves anything. Is that what this has been about ? Semantics?
Science does have tons of evidence though which is why the consensus among the experts is 97% and no science organization in the world disputes it.
Ok... show us the evidence that man made co2 is causing warming. Remember NASA tells us co2 also cools. So don't just point us to some study which projected that co2 warms the earth by reflecting some heat back down... show us the net.
If it is a model show its success rate as it has been walked forward over time.
here is a quote from Jem..." you have some proof that man made co2 is causing warming on earth."
Personally I'm not sure Jem is smart enough to play devil's advocate fc. To take the worse side just for the sake of argument and make it rational takes a degree of intelligence which in my opinion Jem doesn't portray at all . I've noticed you call him out for admitting there is AGW but at the same time he denies it. To me he comes across as confused and two faced rather than devil's advocate.