National Review tries to take down trump, ends up with tail between their legs apologizing

M

Max E.

LOL, the establishment just doesnt get it, they see the trail of carcases trump has laid waste too, and for some reason they want to jump in front of the steam roller. National Review tries to take trump down, ends up apologizing to all of their cancelled subscribers, Trumps poll ratings go up. They either dont get it, or they are just so full of hubris that they cant accept the fact that they lost control of the dialogue, a long time ago when they sold us out with pieces of crap like boehner, or mcconell, or mccain.

Whether you like him or not, you got to appreciate the fact that Trump is simply laying waste to all these elitist ass wipes in the media, on both sides of the aisle. I cant understand how they have such a lack of introspection, that they dont understand they are the reason why Trump exists.



Last night, National Review published articles from twenty conservative intellectuals “Against Trump.” This afternoon, publisher Jack Fowler sent this letter to friends of the magazine:
Dear Friend,

Today is a big day for National Review. Our editors have made a very forceful defense of conservatism, of principle, and against the politics of attitude, in our editorial, Against Trump.

We have received angry calls, and cancel my subscription demands. One in particular broke my heart. Well, let’s hope time heals.

None of this was unexpected.

But: We have also received very strong expressions of support from many NR friends. People who believe and they are right to believe this that the main reason National Review exists is to do the very thing it is doing today.

Defending conservative principle. Defending it from being marginalized, or recast as emotion and bluster instead of as an expression of reason and intelligence.

On behalf of Rich Lowry and my colleagues, thank you for standing with us. Or, better, thanks for letting us stand alongside you as we embrace the Buckley mission: To stand athwart history, yelling stop.

Best,

Jack Fowler

Publisher

National Review

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...l-my-subscription-demands-over-against-trump/
 
Last edited:
the media needs to feel like they are important and covering a serious subject like politics. Trump exposes them and their politics for the siliiness it has become and they don't know how to cover something that in their shallow minds is not serious.
 
We are truly living in bizzaro world, Bill maher and Seth McFarlane sum up the reason for Trump (because pc nonsense went way to far) meanwhile mainstream conservative media tries to attack him from the PC side, its ass backwords.

 
ETcallhome said:
yes, the similarities are errie, but Trump doesn't want to kill anybody and is the most likely candidate to keep us from needing to go to war.
More...


There are no similarities, if what you guys are suggesting is that Trump is some sort of modern day Hitler. It's absurd and highly offensive.

Trump's appeal is based largely on immigration, an issue where everyone knew that the party elites were way out of sync with voters yet stubbornly refused to budge. Trump's radical plan? Enforce existing law, an idea that both parties recoiled in horror from.

If you want to go on a Nazi hunt, look elsewhere. Other than Rand Paul, Trump is the most measured of candidates regarding use of military power. Instead of starting WW III, he suggested working with Putin in Syria. Rubio, Cruz and Christie, the favorites of the NR crowd, all want no fly zones and ramping up confrontations. Of course, it's not like they will be volunteering, but the defense contractors like what they hear.
 
ETcallhome said:
yes, the similarities are errie, but Trump doesn't want to kill anybody and is the most likely candidate to keep us from needing to go to war.
More...

Germany and the rise of Hitler in the 1930s is not in any way similar to the current elections in the U.S. Germany had over 50% unemployment in the early 1930s. We are not in a similar situation in the U.S. and the problems we are facing are much different than Germany's in the 30s (e.g. Germany did not have an illegal immigrant problem).
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
There are no similarities, if what you guys are suggesting is that Trump is some sort of modern day Hitler. It's absurd and highly offensive.

Trump's appeal is based largely on immigration, an issue where everyone knew that the party elites were way out of sync with voters yet stubbornly refused to budge. Trump's radical plan? Enforce existing law, an idea that both parties recoiled in horror from.

If you want to go on a Nazi hunt, look elsewhere. Other than Rand Paul, Trump is the most measured of candidates regarding use of military power. Instead of starting WW III, he suggested working with Putin in Syria. Rubio, Cruz and Christie, the favorites of the NR crowd, all want no fly zones and ramping up confrontations. Of course, it's not like they will be volunteering, but the defense contractors like what they hear.
More...
check out news max tv. they often run old documentaries on the rise of Hitler. These are old documentaries, not Trump hit pieces. All he ever wanted to do was make Germany great again. He could never get over the loss of WWI. I was certainly not comparing Trump to Hitler. Nobody should ever be compared to Hitler. Trump seems very peace loving to me because war is bad business. But I said it before, the fury surrounding Trump by his supporters is eerily similar to 1935 Germany. Not that that is a bad thing.

Now they are running a modern one comparing modern Islamic Extremesim to Nazi ism. And they interveiw old members of the old German Nazi Party. Don't get all pc on me and freak out when somebody mentions Hitler. Just an observation. But I agree, if you want to keep it elevated, his name or the name of his party should never be mentioned again. And nobody should ever be compared to that psychopath.
 
gwb-trading said:
Germany and the rise of Hitler in the 1930s is not in any way similar to the current elections in the U.S. Germany had over 50% unemployment in the early 1930s. We are not in a similar situation in the U.S. and the problems we are facing are much different than Germany's in the 30s (e.g. Germany did not have an illegal immigrant problem).
More...
ha, ha, ha, no. They just had jews.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top