Nassim Taleb: Ask Me Anything

It wasn't supposed to, but bleed continuously until there is a market crash. So in years without a crash he probably lost 15-20%, and when the market makes let's say 5-10%, that is a pretty bad under performance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirica_Capital

"One of Empirica's funds, Empirica Kurtosis LLC, was reported to have made a 60% return in 2000 followed by losses in 2001, 2002, and single digit gains in 2003 and 2004 a period when hedge funds posted average returns of 20% and 9% respectively.

Taleb claimed that he shut down Empirica LLC, in 2005 to become a "writer and a scholar."

Buying puts doesn't take up much time, it sounds like a BS excuse...Although he had a health care too at that time.


Taleb is a smart guy , but apparently has never absorbed the one truth about markets.

Timing is everything.

Except for the other truth that stealing from the public is also a good way to make money.
 
This is their real edge. They can buy tails cheaper than others.

However it should be noted that their publicly stated returns (in news articles and press releases) don't make any sense. Often funds will play with the numerator (by cherry picking the period or segregating a strategy). These guys also play with the denominator. So i would say it's unclear how much they earn or even how much they manage.

My guess is the knowledgeable ones like Buffett wisely going away before crash through keeping maximum cash, while some brave ones would still want to dive in the markets for making good money!




November 6 2016

Warren Buffett is sitting on more cash than ever, almost $US85 billion of it
http://www.smh.com.au/business/mark...lmost-us85-billion-of-it-20161106-gsj0nr.html
 
Last edited:
So he missed a 14% rally?

AFAIK, he may be wrong for that position at that time by losing opportunity, but people can see his investment style, willing to keep a lot of cash, rather than any smart hedging.

His cash can be very useful if any company later requires his help of cash, just like the banks historically.

Much much better than merely 14%!

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wa...s-5-billion-bet-on-bank-of-america-2017-06-30

How Buffett is set to make a cool $12 billion profit on a Bank of America wager
By Tomi Kilgore

Published: July 1, 2017

700 million Bank of America shares would be worth $17 billion at current prices, and make Buffett the largest shareholder

MW-FP514_BACPNG_20170630121202_NS.png


MW-FP522_buffet_20170630133554_ZH.jpg
 
Last edited:
So he missed a 14% rally?



Berkshires Returns (as measured by Book Value Per Share) are up 110% since Jan 1, 2010. The SPX price index is up 111%. Berkshire's Book Value will be based solely on earnings growth and accumulation. The SPX return is driven by earnings growth, earnings accumulation and several turns of multiple expansion. Berkshires Stock is up 150% over the same period. So with 85 billion in cash he's still doing better than the SPX.
 
Can you do the same?

Not trying to challenge you, just want to know if they are unique.

Regards,

No I can't. The only way to do it is to predict through models when a crash is extremely unlikely to happen (and not buy tails then) or to shift pnl around in the distribution (take extreme losses at -5% to fund massive gains at -10%).

Like I said before, I think their returns are suspect and I would wager institutions only invest with them because they have done a good job of marketing themselves as the "hedge" to their hedgefund portfolio.
 
I guess another good reason that Berkshire holds so much cash is because there were a lot of fairly cheap options with the banks shares when buying their stocks.

Just unsure whether those options are still pending for exercise.

That means if the banks he owns options can perform better than SPX, his performance now should be better than the SPX, while still holding a lot of cash that could be later used for exercising the options if he wishes to.

Unless the markets offer him other better opportunities than those banks options he now owns.

The picture of SPX outperforming Berkshire because holding too much cash can be quite incomplete. Even the SPX looks like outperforming all the banks he own. Don't forget the bank options were acquired at fairly cheap cost at prices few years ago.


Holding cash+options VS holding 100% stocks

http://www.nasdaq.com/article/buffetts-strategy-to-make-millions-without-buying-stock-cm466409
Buffett's Strategy To Make Millions Without Buying Stock
April 17, 2015,
 
Last edited:
Back
Top