The math is of course, screwed up. Let's do a 5th grade calculation, shall we?
If you only risk 1% buying put, I don't see how you can get the 3,600% gain from the downturn.
Yeah, something is fishy with the math. Not to mention a hedge still requires
incredibly good timing of catching the bottom and if they can't they can easily give back gazillion % of unrealized gains.
But let's see what they said:
"Spitznagel included a chart in his letter showing that a portfolio invested 96.7% in the S&P 500 and 3.3% in Universa’s fund would have been unscathed in March, a month in which the U.S. equity benchmark fell 12.4%."
So a 1/29 hedge of the funds protected a 1/8th drop .
That is only a 375% return on the hedge!!! So yes, the journalist (and everybody else in this thread) missed a decimal point, no biggie, a rounding error.
Another thing to note is that the bottom was at mid-month, and we bounced like 18% from there (2200 to 2600). We don't know when exactly they cashed out (or locked in) the hedge, but if only at the end of the month, that is giving back some serious profits.
And as a last point, this wasn't a huge, one day black swan event, but a rather orderly, although volatile sell off. We had 5% moves for 2 weeks before the first 10% daily drop came. A decent hedge could have been put on anytime between late February to early March.
About the impossibility of predicting the top, somebody wrote this on February 13th:
The SPX has topped at 3385, currently at 3374.