Quote from atticus:
That's a voluntary wrap-up, as such, it's meaningless. It certainly doesn't imply they went debit.
OK Atticus, here's my point. Taleb's "success" is only swallowed by novices, but there is no proof of any trading success.
Paloma colleagues say he was removed from trading to research, and the only evidence of his subsequent fund's "voluntary" wrap up is on a "Troubled" companies forum showing Empirica Kurtosis' wrap up. Sure that doesn't prove anything, but it puts the onus on Taleb to stop the B.S. and produce some verifiable results, since he has absolutely zero street cred.
Then there is Taleb's "disclosure" mumble swerve in public forums:
"Empirica LLC, which owns interests in hedge funds, and operates a research
laboratory in London, Empirica Laboratory Limited, and a Hedging operation (no,
it is not a "hedge fund" in the common accepted sense as the bulk of the
business consists in portfolio protection packages. We only called it a HF in
May-October 2001)."
So what is Taleb saying (B.S. ing)? He is parsing and redefining "common accepted sense" as in depends on your definition of "is". Taleb claims that Empirica's "fund" was only called that in 2001, yet the wind up of Empirica Kurtosis occured in 2004.
Instead of a track record, he produces hot air. The onus is on Taleb to prove he is more than an empty suit when it comes to trading.