Did you read the abstract, at least?
Please, Enlighten me!
Did you read the abstract, at least?
You suck and know nothing. You need pigs for perspective.
Does Your MAMA know you are on the computer?
Does Your MAMA know you are on the computer?
I am merely pointing out that you probably have not read the original papers. Instead, it's very likely that you are parroting some idiot on the internet who did not either.Please, Enlighten me!
NICEThe market likes to first trap its victims, and then to slowly torture them until they throw in the towel.
Exactly
11 years of “buy every 1% dip” has programmed everyone to think this will be over quickly.
After the initial free fall, then comes the relentless selling followed by another vicious bear rally that people think is another bottom. Rinse and repeat.
Here in Miami, it was 90 degrees on Wednesday. Temperature hasn't been under 70 in about a month. Yet the virus is still around. While its possible it is temperature sensitive, the fact that its so contagious overrides this temperature sensitivity, IMO
I am merely pointing out that you probably have not read the original papers. Instead, it's very likely that you are parroting some idiot on the internet who did not either.
Anyways, I barely skimmed it, and it's hard to give a specific opinion without carefully reading the article itself. However, I can see that they were using two different viruses as experimental models and that is their primary conclusion is that these viruses do survive on surfaces across the two experimental temperatures they've used. This said, multiple papers mention that viruses get inactivated faster at higher temperatures but pretty much all of them caveat that it will have little impact on the dynamics of transmission. I am not a virologist (though I do have a dated PhD in a related field) and it's hard for me to comment further.