Quote from Ghost of Cutten:
Of course they prefer that in hindsight. But they chose to sell at the *market* - not at the price of their choosing. It is completely unfair that the people who sold at the worst prices - demanding liquidity at the worst possible time - get to avoid any losses, whilst the people who sold earlier get hosed, and worst still, the people who stepped up to the plate to buy get screwed and are not only out huge $$$ but are naked short from -59%. Imagine losing 59% of your capital in 30 minutes because you bought the low of the day when no one else provided liquidity - just because some pen pushing bureaucrat let a precious algo trader or I-bank desk monkey sweet talk him.
The people who used stops and got bad fills? Fuck them, they caused this crash with their dumb trading.
All I can say is I feel lucky that I actually read exchange regulations so I know i) what the bustout ranges are ii) to never close out a position that you got outside the bustout ranges, until they confirm at the exchange that it's not being busted.
This is corrupt as fuck basically.
You could just place all your trades at 60% and wait for a black swan...........Chachacha CHING!!!!!Quote from trom:
Ahh yeah...like a 60% envelope. It didn't occur to me that anything was actually going up at that point in time...
Quote from sappjason:
Hey Ghost,
Any pointers on where I can get more educated on "bust out" levels for various US equities exchanges? I did very well today (+$24k) and I've reviewed all of my trades that took place in between 2:40 and 3:00 and it looks like I'm in very good shape. But, for future reference, I would love to understand these "bust out" levels better.
Thanks,
Jason
Quote from Ghost of Cutten:
Of course they prefer that in hindsight. But they chose to sell at the *market* - not at the price of their choosing.

Quote from VoodooMMI:
I agree. A "market" order to sell is an order to sell at the highest price available at that moment, even if that price is extremely low. The simple solution is to get rid of market orders. Of course that is extremely unlikely to happen because the institutional firms make a lot of money off the retail traders' market orders. The reason I never use market orders is that I want to determine the price that I'll sell at and not let someone (or something) else decide at how low of a price I would be willing to sell. But what about "stop" orders you say? Use a "stop limit" order instead with one price for the stop and a different price for the limit (i.e. sell 1 ES with a stop of 1100 and a limit of 1090). Are you guaranteed a fill? No, but you need to be aware of the limitations of your orders. Perhaps a better alternative would be to already be long a protective put. Or even more simply, just be flat. If you are already flat, you may even want to put in a bid and try to scoop up some bargains.
May 6th, 2010 is a perfect example of why you need a trading plan. You need to plan what to do, or not do. In extreme circumstances, that's when you need your plan the most. On May 6th, 2010 the ES futures fell about 6% in a few minutes. What if it had fallen 10%, 20%, 30% or more in a few minutes, what would you have done? Will you plan cover all scenarios? Probably not, but the more scenarios you have covered, the better.