NASA Scientist Predicts Mini Ice Age

Error in major climate study revealed – warming NOT higher than expected
By Maxim Lott | Fox News
694940094001_5695967449001_5695961078001-vs.jpg



Continue Reading Below


A major new climate study in the journal Nature got worldwide media coverage for finding that the oceans warmed dramatically faster than previously thought — but now the researchers have retracted that conclusion after a man in the United Kingdom blogged aboutflaws he discovered in the paper.

Just two weeks after publication, the study authors have revised their paper, and now conclude that the oceans are warming fast -- but at the same rate as other measurements have found.

A study co-author took responsibility for the error. “I accept responsibility for these oversights because it was my role to ensure that details of the measurements were correctly understood and taken up by coauthors,” study co-author Ralph Keeling wrote in an explanation of the revision.

CATASTROPHIC GLOBAL WARMING LESS LIKELY, STUDY SAYS

The error was first discovered by Nic Lewis, a retired British man who holds a bachelors degree in math from the University of Cambridge and who reads science papers for fun. He has also written a couple of published papers of his own on climate science.

Continue Reading Below


“I've always liked to understand the world and to check whether people's research makes sense to me. Once I find something that seems wrong to me, I like to get to the bottom of it,” Lewis told Fox News.

Lewis said the incident should serve as a cautionary tale.

AL GORE WOULD HAVE LOST GLOBAL WARMING BET, ACADEMIC SAYS

“I think it shows that the fact that a study is peer-reviewed and published by a premier journal gives very little assurance that its findings are valid,” Lewis said.

“I was slightly surprised that neither the peer reviewers nor the editor had spotted what seemed to me an obvious red flag on page 1 of the paper,” he added.

Lewis said that the reviewers who approved that paper may have looked less closely for errors because the conclusion agreed with the typical belief that global warming is an extreme crisis.

'ARBITRARY' ADJUSTMENTS EXAGGERATE SEA LEVEL RISE, STUDY FINDS

But all involved, including Lewis, agree that manmade greenhouse gas emissions are warming the oceans.

“People shouldn't be left with the impression that the errors in this paper put into doubt whether the ocean interior is warming. It clearly is wholly or mainly due to human greenhouse gas emissions,” Lewis said.

The study co-author who took responsibility for the error also made that point.

TERRIFYING CLIMATE CHANGE WARNING: 12 YEARS UNTIL WE’RE DOOMED

“The evidence for ocean warming continues to be supported by millions of temperature readings throughout the oceans made by the international Argo network of sensors,” Keeling told Fox News.

The Argo network of sensors consists of nearly 4,000 floats around the world that observe the ocean. The study done by Keeling and his coauthors attempted to estimate ocean temperatures a totally different way -- “by using measurements of atmospheric oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) ... which increase as the ocean warms and releases gases.”

Keeling said that such a study still had some value.

GLOBAL WARMING WILL RUIN BEER, SCIENTISTS WARN

“Our study still also provides independent evidence that the ocean is warming. We accept that our method doesn’t determine the amount of warming as precisely as we previously thought,” Keeling added.

Keeling also acknowledged Lewis for pointing out the error.

“The scientific process is self-correcting when errors are made or new evidence is discovered. Hats off to Nic Lewis for his role here,” Keeling said.

WORLD'S LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANY HEADS TO ARCTIC AS CLIMATE CHANGE MAY OPEN UP NEW ROUTES

While the Earth has warmed — government data show that the planet is nearly 2°F warmer than in the 1970s — researchers like Lewis make the case that climate models are not that great and may overpredict warming.

“Climate science suffers from being politicized,” Lewis told Fox News. “It’s too infected by the idea of consensus and models... warming is likely to be less severe than global climate models say.”

The author, Maxim Lott, is Executive Producer of Stossel TV and creator of ElectionBettingOdds.com. He can be reached on Twitter at @MaximLott


One study . Changes nothing. The oceans are still rapidly gaining heat. The following chart has not changed a bit.

"But all involved, including Lewis, agree that manmade greenhouse gas emissions are warming the oceans.

“People shouldn't be left with the impression that the errors in this paper put into doubt whether the ocean interior is warming. It clearly is wholly or mainly due to human greenhouse gas emissions,” Lewis said."




Fox News, news for tribal dummies, to keep them tribal and ignorant. Never will you hear about the overwhelming scientific consensus or the common sense science of man made global warming or see the facts as in the chart below.

So keep watching Fox News and stay deluded and ignorant.

Ocean_Heat_Content_%282012%29.png
 
Last edited:
We have seen this cold weather kicking in November. DC had the earliest snow in 29 years. We have seen the MMGW models completely break down.

https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/16/a-mi...-and-its-going-to-get-very-very-cold-8146529/

Humanity is facing a long, cold winter which could see temperatures across the planet plunge to depressing lows. That’s the warning from a Nasa scientist who fears sunspot activity on the surface of our star has dropped so low that it could herald the arrival of a uniquely grim mini Ice Age. ‘We see a cooling trend,’ Martin Mlynczak of Nasa’s Langley Research Center told Space Weather. ‘High above Earth’s surface, near the edge of space, our atmosphere is losing heat energy.

‘If current trends continue, it could soon set a Space Age record for cold.’ Sunspot activity follows a cycle which is believed to last 11 years as the number of patches peaks and drops. There have been very few spots on the sun for most of this year, meaning that it could be about to get very cold, very quickly. ‘It could happen in a matter of months,’ Mlynczak added.
Blame it on global warming!
 
And the ocean heat seems concentrated in the the Indian Ocean where there are underwater vents.

The polar ice caps are being melted in part by under ice volcanoes. There are studies that show this.

If any ocean warming or polar ice melting is being caused by man made C02 it has yet to be proven. There are no peer reviewed studies showing man made C02 are causing those issues.

Imagine trying to show ocean warming is being caused by man made CO2 is not caused by vents or not caused by the Sun or solar activity. Especially since CO2 levels trail ocean warming and cooling.

There is just no science at the moment supporting the conjecture ocean warming could be caused by man made co2.

As we speak the lack of Solar Activity may be causing a world wide cool down.
And to anticpate Futurecurrents mispresentations... I will bet the other monthly charts show similar cool downs. I will bet they are not significantly different. But he will not show you monthly charts which cover the latest months. .
He will present yearly charts.




UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2018_v6.jpg







http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2018_v6.jpg
 
Who will benefit from global warming and climate control regulations? (Serious question)

This propaganda has been pushed by the left wingers for decades. Although I believe in protecting our environment, I also feel that there are propaganda being pushed and have hidden agendas.

Anyone could shed some light?
 
Who will benefit from global warming and climate control regulations? (Serious question)

This propaganda has been pushed by the left wingers for decades. Although I believe in protecting our environment, I also feel that there are propaganda being pushed and have hidden agendas.

Anyone could shed some light?
I suspect you're talking to FruitCakes. The best thing to do is what I have. I ignore the liar. He?She is just promoting their own narrative even though they know it to be false. Sadly, though, he?she is so far into this that they dare not admit to the fraud.
 
Back
Top