You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
NASA, NSO & Others Agree - Global Cooling Expected
- Thread starter pspr
- Start date
Quote from pspr:
AGW Alarmists are left scrambling to explain this inconvenient truth.
New data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration show atmospheric carbon dioxide levels continue to rise but global temperatures are not following suit. The new data undercut assertions that atmospheric carbon dioxide is causing a global warming crisis.
NOAA data show atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rose 2.67 parts per million in 2012 to 395 ppm. The jump was the second-highest since 1959, when scientists began measuring atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.
Global temperatures are essentially the same today as they were in the mid-to-late 1990s, when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were 360 ppm. Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rose 10 percent between 1995 and 2012, yet global temperatures did not rise at all. Global warming activists are having a difficult time explaining the ongoing disconnect between atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and global temperatures.
This isnât the first time in recent years that global temperatures have disobeyed the models presented by global warming activists. From the mid-1940s through the mid-1970s, global temperatures endured a 30-year decline even as atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rose nearly 10 percent. From 1900 through 1945, by contrast, global temperatures rose rapidly despite a lack of coal power plants, SUVs, and substantial carbon dioxide emissions.
http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/2013/03/08/co2-keeps-rising-temperatures-refuse-follow
Brought to by Exxon and the Koch bros. Creating CO2 pollution from the burning of our oil and coal since 1921. LOL
Your such a dope.
Heartland? Why oh why can't you ever use unbiased authoritative sources.
Quote from pspr:
<a href=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/23/team-of-ex-nasa-scientists-concludes-no-imminent-threat-from-man-made-co2/>Team of Ex-NASA Scientists Concludes No Imminent Threat from Man-Made CO2</a>
Oh, you mean Republican astronauts and engineers? LOL
Why oh why can't you ever use unbiased authoritative sources.
You are an idiot.
You mean as opposed to your liberal dogma, dumbass?Quote from futurecurrents:
Oh, you mean Republican astronauts and engineers? LOL
Why oh why can't you ever use unbiased authoritative sources.
You are an idiot.
I guess NASA scientists aren't good enough for you. You prefer idiots of your own persuasion.
You are just the dumbest motherfucker around here futurecunt. You have been shown to be the biggest fool we've seen around here since Mr. Market.
Typical liberal fool response.
The messenger is unimportant.
The facts are.
The messenger is unimportant.
The facts are.
Quote from futurecurrents:
Brought to by Exxon and the Koch bros. Creating CO2 pollution from the burning of our oil and coal since 1921. LOL
Your such a dope.
Heartland? Why oh why can't you ever use unbiased authoritative sources.
Quote from jem:
Typical liberal fool response.
The messenger is unimportant.
The facts are.
The point is, who the fuck cares what a bunch of unqualified political ideologues think about AGW.
I listen to the 97% of the world's climatologists and all it's science organizations.
You are insane. Take your meds.
Now you are back to your lie. That has been proven false and irrelevant.Quote from futurecurrents:
The point is, who the fuck cares what a bunch of unqualified political ideologues think about AGW.
I listen to the 97% of the world's climatologists and all it's science organizations.
You are insane. Take your meds.
Now you are just acting like a loser. Maybe that is because that is exactly what your are in life.
The undeniable facts are still there.
Temp has stayed the same or cooled since 98.
Yet your CO2 forcing models state the temperature must be much higher cause CO2 is much higher.
So your idea of what CO2 does is dead ass wrong.
That is the message... Deal with it.
Temp has stayed the same or cooled since 98.
Yet your CO2 forcing models state the temperature must be much higher cause CO2 is much higher.
So your idea of what CO2 does is dead ass wrong.
That is the message... Deal with it.
Quote from futurecurrents:
The point is, who the fuck cares what a bunch of unqualified political ideologues think about AGW.
I listen to the 97% of the world's climatologists and all it's science organizations.
You are insane. Take your meds.
Quote from jem:
The undeniable facts are still there.
Temp has stayed the same or cooled since 98.
Yet your CO2 forcing models state the temperature must be much higher cause CO2 is much higher.
So your idea of what CO2 does is dead ass wrong.
That is the message... Deal with it.
Are you really this stupid or are you just pretending to be a Republican? If so, you are doing a good job.
Oh BTW temps have gone up over the last 4 , 8, 12, 18, 25, 50,100, and 1000 years.
It seems you are the stupid one here. All you can do is spread lies about the last 17 years. No Warming, dumbass!!!!!Quote from futurecurrents:
Are you really this stupid or are you just pretending to be a Republican? If so, you are doing a good job.
Oh BTW temps have gone up over the last 4 , 8, 12, 18, 25, 50,100, and 1000 years.
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 11â12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature.
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5â10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature.
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature.
► Changes in ocean temperatures explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980.
► Changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818112001658