NASA, NSO & Others Agree - Global Cooling Expected

this is what I mean... those projections failed.
they called for more warming and we have not had warming in 16 years. There is no science supporting those projections.

And for that matter... there was no science supporting those projections when they were made. We showed you the footnotes to the 2007 UN study which had those pretty charts.

They footnote said there was no science showing the forcings by CO2.

It was just pretty charts. Which have now been contra indicated by the facts.



Quote from futurecurrents:

You're fucking insane.

ar4-fig-6-10.gif





global_warming_predictions.png
 
Quote from jem:

http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c017d40e9842b970c-pi

look a that chart.
CO2 goes up... while temperature goes down or stays the same during 3 different parts of the temperature record.

there is no science showing CO2 to be a significant driver of temps.

its most likely the Sun.
The CO2 theory of global warming has blown up along with all the AGW models government supported scientists have created. The only AGW followers are now the government cap 'n tax politicians and their government paid scientists. Oh, and a few ignorant blind fools like futureCunt.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

And yet still there is no reliable source saying the the earth will cool and in fact all reliable sources say the earth will continue to rapidly warm and with an increasing rate.


Global_Warming_Predictions.png

Those "projections" have been way off.........


wsj-16-scientist-response-graph.jpg
 
Quote from Arnie:

Those "projections" have been way off.........


wsj-16-scientist-response-graph.jpg

That's not "way off". It's within the expected range of deviation around the trend. These things don't move in straight lines. El Nino cycles and variations of aerosols in the upper atmosphere cause some of these variations and some of the new heat is inconsistantly absorbed into the oceans.

The vast bulk of the accumulating heat is going into the oceans. The heat content of these is a better indicator of how the earth is warming due to the thermal inertia.

heat_content55-07.png
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

That's not "way off". It's within the expected range of deviation around the trend. These things don't move in straight lines. El Nino cycles and variations of aerosols in the upper atmosphere cause some of these variations and some of the new heat is inconsistantly absorbed into the oceans.

The vast bulk of the accumulating heat is going into the oceans. The heat content of these is a better indicator of how the earth is warming due to the thermal inertia.

heat_content55-07.png

since we dont have global warming we now have ocean warming.
what a crock of shit.

warming oceans may lead to cooler overall temperatures.
we cam see the oceans warm, they release co2, as the co2 and water vapor accumulate due to ocean warming, the suns warming effects get blocked and we suffer cooling.

we cool.

warm oceans means more clouds over the land mass.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

That's not "way off". It's within the expected range of deviation around the trend. These things don't move in straight lines. El Nino cycles and variations of aerosols in the upper atmosphere cause some of these variations and some of the new heat is inconsistantly absorbed into the oceans.

The vast bulk of the accumulating heat is going into the oceans. The heat content of these is a better indicator of how the earth is warming due to the thermal inertia.

heat_content55-07.png

<img src=http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQESEdNrFYHVTmR-bkAnFAPGcGgHrLRZUp6g2vsI7WdpngDwEpz1g>
 
Quote from jem:

since we dont have global warming we now have ocean warming.
what a crock of shit.

warming oceans may lead to cooler overall temperatures.
we cam see the oceans warm, they release co2, as the co2 and water vapor accumulate due to ocean warming, the suns warming effects get blocked and we suffer cooling.

we cool.

warm oceans means more clouds over the land mass.

by the way those studies are way off.
Only the last one is withing the very wide range recently created.
a range which includes cooling or no observeable warming.

that is the 2007 study... whose footnote... says we have no idea if co2 is forcing temps. hence the no warming range in the forecast.
 
Back
Top