NASA chief wants to send some people to the moon permanently

upload_2018-8-25_17-12-42.png
 
I'm fairly certain we're looking at the same thing...My image showing only one hemisphere

Flat thing against round thing? I'm not being a pedant just there are children about (trumpers..). ;)

Any moon colony would likely be polar at least initially. There is water available in the deep craters and they have the best radiation shielding. It is also a great place to run a lot of science.

The big draw is helium 3 of course and as in the movie Moon, probably need little to not really that much manpower.

https://io9.gizmodo.com/5908499/could-helium-3-really-solve-earths-energy-problems
 
Flat thing against round thing? I'm not being a pedant just there are children about (trumpers..). ;)

Any moon colony would likely be polar at least initially. There is water available in the deep craters and they have the best radiation shielding. It is also a great place to run a lot of science.

The big draw is helium 3 of course and as in the movie Moon, probably need little to not really that much manpower.

https://io9.gizmodo.com/5908499/could-helium-3-really-solve-earths-energy-problems

Cons are flat earthers that think the landing was filmed in Hollywood. We're having a two person discussion here.
 
Back
Top