NASA: Al Gore, It's The Sun Stupid!

morons, (you know who you are :D

the result of a scientific study is not a measure of it's relevancy

we NEED to study 'global warming' and its potential impact.

we need to study it regardless of the results of scientific inquiry
 
Come on bigdave,

Today's population of 6.5 billion can go into a cube of the following dimensions:

787 metres x 787 metres x 787 metres, i.e.:
860 yards x 860 yards x 860 yards, or
0.49 mile x 0.49 mile x 0.49 mile

The nasty non-ecological population in year 1000 was 310 million. 310 million people goes into a cube of the following dimensions:

28.5 metres x 28.5 metres x 28.5 metres, i.e.:
31 yards x 31 yards x 31 yards


Answer the simple question: did the population of 31x31x31 yards with its all heavy industry and deforestation cause the climate change / warming in medieval ages in some parts of the globe (Greenland)?
 
Quote from Tresor:

Come on bigdave,

Today's population of 6.5 billion can go into a cube of the following dimensions:

787 metres x 787 metres x 787 metres, i.e.:
860 yards x 860 yards x 860 yards, or
0.49 mile x 0.49 mile x 0.49 mile
More...

Yes, but it wouldn't smell very good.

The nasty non-ecological population in year 1000 was 310 million. 310 million people goes into a cube of the following dimensions:

28.5 metres x 28.5 metres x 28.5 metres, i.e.:
31 yards x 31 yards x 31 yards

Answer the simple question: did the population of 31x31x31 yards with its all heavy industry and deforestation cause the climate change / warming in medieval ages in some parts of the globe (Greenland)? [/B]
More...

No, enough game playing. I've answered your questions. I want you to answer my question. I've asked this three different ways and you've refused to engage in any debate.

In your mind, does CO2 absorb infra-red energy?
 
The whole debate about global warming is just another smoking screen. At least, Al Gore has chosen his works during Sun spot acted greatest year, which show his intelligence beyond most people. :D Anyway, It is all about green jobs, find some thing for people to do, green cars, green house, it is for job creations, at least, scientists have job to do more studies on global warming. :D Better than starting new wars, people being drafted by military.
 
NEVER FORGET...........CO2 is the LIFE GAS of this planet and without it we can't have carbon sequestration from plants/trees!

Don't let Al gore and his "carbon tax" personal wealth accumulation scam ever trick you into thinking CO2 is bad!!!

Even recently these dumb a$$'s have tried to say water (H20) is now bad too (and the government needs to control ALL WATTER ON ALL LANDS....to include PRIVATE PROPERTY......FU(% THAT!!!).......what a bunch of FU(%ED UP PIECES OF $HIT!!!

I will gladly take a warming Earth over a frozen one!!! :cool:


90% of Global Climate change = Sun Activity

10% of Global Climate change = All other B.S.

Humans at this point have ZERO ability to PROVE my percentages wrong...........P E R I O D ! ! !

:cool:
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

morons, (you know who you are :D

the result of a scientific study is not a measure of it's relevancy

we NEED to study 'global warming' and its potential impact.

we need to study it regardless of the results of scientific inquiry
More...




so, does your thinking also arrive at the conclusion that we "NEED" to tax trillions, create mass unemployment/sarvation during this quest towards the truth of "Global Warming"


useful idiot-leftists
 
Quote from FeenixRizin:

so, does your thinking also arrive at the conclusion that we "NEED" to tax trillions, create mass unemployment/sarvation during this quest towards the truth of "Global Warming"

useful idiot-leftists
More...

Nonsense. The EU, for example, already reduced it's power plant emissions by over 3% -- the entire Kyoto goal is 5%.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601072&sid=aF1KaicdYL9o

There is no mass starvation and no massive change in unemployment.
 
But you FORGET, the deadliest killer used by ALL nasty governments and their globalist "directed" games..........


INCREMENTALISM!!! :eek: :mad:


In the beginning it is 3% and then ten years latter al gore has everyone with fart tubes from our a$$ to our noses!!! :eek:
 
Quote from AMT4SWA:

But you FORGET, the deadliest killer used by ALL nasty governments and their globalist "directed" games..........


INCREMENTALISM!!! :eek: :mad:


In the beginning it is 3% and then ten years latter al gore has everyone with fart tubes from our a$$ to our noses!!! :eek:
More...

This is so typical of the loonie GW deniers on this thread. You really couldn't care if the science is right or wrong. What's more, you are never likely to find out anything about the science if you confine your reading to the likes of PrisonPlanet or it's ilk.

It's just politics to you and pushing your own peculiar brand thereof, that matters.

It is a fact that the great majority of climate scientists are of the opinion that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere is a major factor in warming and that given the trends the problem is urgent. Common sense says that one should think seriously about this. Were it any other scientific field, then this so called "controversy" would not exist.

If you went to twenty doctors and 19 out of 20 said there was a 95% chance you had a serious disease, your response would probably be that they were in the pay of the drug companies and take the advice of the odd man out.

In the end, it may turn out that CO2 is or is not a major factor in GW, but at the moment, the best evidence suggests very strongly that it is. To ignore that is to take an absurd risk.
 
bigdave,

I really want to close history and proceed to calculations.

I have modyfied my previous questions and put it in context to help you answer it. The modyfied question reads:

The nasty non-ecological population in year 1000 was 310 million. 310 million people goes into a cube of the following dimensions:

28.5 metres x 28.5 metres x 28.5 metres, i.e.:
31 yards x 31 yards x 31 yards

The population of ants at that time could go into 20,000 (twenty thousand) such cubes, each of 31 yards x 31 yards x 31 yards.

Now assuming the human population did nothing but farted all the time and released CO2 out of their lungs, could humans 1000 years ago contribute more to climate change than ants did?

Answer this question and we can move on to more interesting issues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top