Nancy Pelosi’s husband made some big tech purchases

Cuddles said:
no, you showed me how someone did something and tried to tie it to someone else entirely w/a blanket "these people". Listen, I have absolutely no illusion thinking politicians aren't corrupt, and Pelosi's pillow talk w/her husband may involve things that are straight up illegal. It's another thing entirely to have cold hard facts instead of suspicions.
More...

Well, I don't like her, and I am suspicious of her. But I am also fully aware that I will never make a difference in what's going on; I have to be realistic. It's been going on for decades, and it will continue. There is no stopping it. I rather focus on myself, and my trading, and read some cool new threads:

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/elite-trader-school.360180/
 
ChipShotTrader said:
I am pretty sure she is NOT the only one. She does not come from money. However, she sits at the top, and sets an example for others.

USD $106 Million personal fortune, while making $200K a year. I mean, what more proof do you need?

A piece of shit human being, and I really dislike her...

@Sig Check out how she treats the highly respected "60 Minutes" Journalist, at 9:15. Like a thug...


***On a side note, this reminds me of this:
"How much did Goldman Sachs Profit 2008?
NEW YORK, December 16, 2008 - The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS) today reported net revenues of $22.22 billon and net earnings of $2.32 billon for the year ended November 28, 2008. Dec 16, 2008"

"Who is Henry Paulson?
Henry Paulson, the 74th Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, served under President George W. Bush between July 2006 and January 2009.1
Before his tenure as Secretary of the Treasury, Henry “Hank” Paulson, Jr. worked for Goldman Sachs for 32 years, including his time as the chair and chief executive officer. Paulson is best known for leading the response to the 2008 financial crisis while serving as the of Secretary of the Treasury."

PS. Can you see something? Maybe proof needs to be presented on this truly magical coincidence...
More...
Like I said, there's no question she's gratuitously mean. But like I also said, the wealth didn't come from her salary, it came from her husband's work as a VC, there's a pretty clear track record for how he earned it, and that's not an unusual amount of wealth for someone with his track record at all. Plenty to pick on with her that she's actually guilty of, no need to keep harping on this which is actually a red herring.
 
Sig said:
Like I said, there's no question she's gratuitously mean. But like I also said, the wealth didn't come from her salary, it came from her husband's work as a VC, there's a pretty clear track record for how he earned it, and that's not an unusual amount of wealth for someone with his track record at all. Plenty to pick on with her that she's actually guilty of, no need to keep harping on this which is actually a red herring.
More...

Like I mentioned above, regardless of what's really going on, I will have zero effect concerning any type of change. Whether good or bad, I will never make a difference, in a pretty broken system. Logically, I must walk away, focus on myself, and my trading, and live a happy life...
 
ChipShotTrader said:
Like I mentioned above, regardless of what's really going on, I will have zero effect concerning any type of change. Whether good or bad, I will never make a difference, in a pretty broken system. Logically, I must walk away, focus on myself, and my trading, and live a happy life...
More...
just vote for people who don't take big donor donations. It'll take 50 yrs, but one day we may see citizens united overturned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top