Might be better if he had the accuracy using #2.Quote from daddyeaux:
I say we hire this guy for future FED meetings...at least he hits what he aims at.
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Councilman-Arrested-for-Peeing-on-Crowd.html
Might be better if he had the accuracy using #2.Quote from daddyeaux:
I say we hire this guy for future FED meetings...at least he hits what he aims at.
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Councilman-Arrested-for-Peeing-on-Crowd.html
Quote from jprad:
The sad calculus that renders your argument invalid is this; the debt created each time the Fed prints new money can never be paid off unless you print more money. But, each time you print more money it comes attached with even more interest.
It's the ultimate ponzi scheme that is a direct affront to the Constitution because the beneficiaries of that interest paid are not the taxpayers but the private owners of the Fed.
Not sure what you're getting at, but at some point someone needs to be able to tell juan and carlos when it's time to print.Quote from jprad:
The sad calculus that renders your argument invalid is this; the debt created each time the Fed prints new money can never be paid off unless you print more money. But, each time you print more money it comes attached with even more interest.
It's the ultimate ponzi scheme that is a direct affront to the Constitution because the beneficiaries of that interest paid are not the taxpayers but the private owners of the Fed.
Quote from bkveen3:
This is my biggest problem. Why do we have a private institution creating money for us.