Quote from sle:
<<< Every sane person would look at risk control before initiating the trades, not when the shit hits the fan (see my Nth rant about "adjustments"). >>>
I respectfully disagree.
I think many traders who impliment some hedged type trades, "assume" they are more protected than they actually are.
And as a result, they are often drawn into volatile stocks and sectors that pay better than less volatile stocks and sectors.
They may also use excessive leverage, because they feel protected.
They may not be as quick to close a deteriorating trade, because they feel protected.
They may over concentrate in that volatile sector, because that's where the money is, and they feel protected.
They may not be overly concerned about a companies fundamentals, because they feel protected. And so are less picky about what stocks/sectors they get into, and which to avoid.
I think for a lot of investors who feel protected, (in the form of only being exposed to "limited losses"), other forms of risk management take a back seat to the potential gains offered by the trade.
<<< Problem is that no matter how good your market intelligence is you can't protect yourself from fraud or a natural disaster. >>>
I agree.
All we can do is try to manage our risk inteliigently, in what ever form we are most comfortable with.
That being, diversification, not over concentrating cash, not excessive leverage, various hedging strategies, being picky about what stocks or indexes we use, setting reasonable % return goals relative to the VIX enviroment we are in, , ect....
It isn't a stock that drops 25 - 35% suddenly that kills investors.
It's being on excessive leverage when it occurs, and/or over concentrating, and/or being in an over debted piece of crap that isn't recoverable, and so on...
It's just been my observation over the years, that the more protected an investor feels because he is hedged, the less attention they sometimes pay to the other forms of "sane" protection.