My only edge is technical analysis

[BuzzTrader]

You are lacking qualifications to even make such a statement and your response indicates a typical and predictable response to someone who is projecting in order to protect their psyche from something they don't understand. Let me know when you get some credentials. Reading your blather has ceased to be entertaining

.....

There is no reason for me to understand it if the math has no basis in engineering. I don't care about it so how would that hurt my psyche ? It doesn't, I am Instrumentalist.

 

[BuzzTrader]

I don't know why I would want to look into that it's old news and of course I'm well aware of have studied the works of all of those people at that conference How do you think I finally figured out how to prove this I didn't just pull this out of the air one fine day but to conflate anything that I'm working on with string theory shows a complete inability to do anything except the rehash concepts you've been exposed to already and also the limitations of this medium of communication apparently. Basically your false association of my work with string theory is bogus and it would behoove you to correct that for your own sake because of the resulting increased clarity of thought that would result.

Science branched off because of a discretionary decision.

 

[SunTrader]

Try landing a lunar module on the moon with ancient roman engineering.

 

[BuzzTrader]

Try landing a lunar module on the moon with ancient roman engineering.

Are you Chinese ?

Math related to engineering counts, the rest not so much.

 

[SunTrader]

You wouldn't get banter if your life depended on it.

Bait and switch much.

 

[Lee-me]

View attachment 345681
Aloha to the people running bots,
You all sound the same. How are you going to feed yourself when this is the best you can do? Please consider a new profession. I want what’s best for you and your family.
@Lee-me @charlotte_daily


More importantly, PA > TA

WOW, shock and awe.

 

[oshjdf]

TA as only edge is okay if it is highly discretionary. When it is fully systematic you are mostly in trouble, as your edge is (too) small. That is what recent studies are highlighting. A few coding lines cannot replace a full human. Trading is an art, that is why.

Not necessarily true. My methodology right now is fully systematic (but not fully automated) and the result is reproducible by other traders if I share it. For me, the problem with automation is reduction of trade frequency. The patterns/behaviors may not fulfill 100% of code thus not detected but when my eyes see it, the price play like my assumption. The great thing is I am not glued to screen and I still can attain the normal trade frequency per month by adding other symbols.