Quote from CPTrader:
Wow! That's quite disheartening. Perhaps I should cancel my new laptop order........
Quote from mnx:
I'm pretty sure Gnome is wrong on this one.
All backtesting software is known to be extremely processor intensive... A faster cpu will *likely* speed things up.
I've got 3 machiens here, dual core @ 2.5GHz, 2.9GHz and a quad core oc'ed to 3.4GHz. If you want me to test something and time it for you, I'd be more than glad to do it.
- mnx
Quote from CPTrader:
Thanks mnx, so what's best to improve backtestig software perfrmance - the processor or the RAM. Or are they equally important?
Do you notice any meaningful difference between your dual core and quad core machines?
Quote from mnx:
I'm pretty sure Gnome is wrong on this one.
All backtesting software is known to be extremely processor intensive... A faster cpu will *likely* speed things up.
Quote from CPTrader:
Thanks mnx, so what's best to improve backtestig software perfrmance - the processor or the RAM. Or are they equally important?
Do you notice any meaningful difference between your dual core and quad core machines?
Quote from gnome:
IF the problem is software, a faster CPU will likely NOT improve things much. Best to find out before buying. And "100% CPU" is usually due to faulty software.
Quote from mnx:
software optimizations can usually do a lot more than getting faster hardware, and yes I agree 100% cpu usage is frequently "faulty" software..... BUT ....
in this case I do not believe that it is NOT faulty software... I think the backtesting software is cpu intensive and it is fully utilizing the cpu, and therefore getting a faster cpu will make a big difference.
- mnx
Quote from gnome:
Quads are faster. Not because of the multi-thread capability, but they just run faster... not by much in most cases..
Best bang for the buck is E8200 or Q6600.
Quote from gnome:
4. I much prefer the TrueBrite glossy screen. I wouldn't get a laptop without it these days.