My Letter to the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Economic Growth.

  • Thread starter Thread starter morganist
  • Start date Start date
It is all my work I have produce the papers. The fact that you can't find that is evidence that the work is mine. The evidence of the works use is that the government has used it and I have letters stating they would use the work. There are direct extractions of my work that have been included in the Pension Tax Manual. Why are they suddenly hitting the economic targets now when previously they hadn't, it all about managing pension saving rates.

It is not the universities that publish the papers it is think tanks like the IEA and the ASI who publish papers. The Bank of England would not publish it, it would be the Department of Work and Pensions or the Treasury or the Inland Revenue and the work would be the Pension Tax Manual, which there are direct extractions of my work included in them. If you want to see published article I have written for think tanks see below.

These were published at the Adam Smith Institute.

http://morganisteconomics.blogspot.com/search/label/Adam Smith Institute

This was published at the Institute of Economic Affairs.

https://iea.org.uk/blog/salary-sacrifice-–-should-it-be-sacrificed

This is the Pension Tax Manual.

https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/pensions-tax-manual

Below is an extract from my book Modern Applied Macroeconomics 2006 - 2020 by Peter James Rhys Morgan, which puts forward alterations to the Pension Tax Manual.


Could the way that pension payments are made be altered to fit in with the new individual pension saving method rather than the current pension system?


Details of the 3 methods of claiming tax relief.


RPSM 05101310 s191


‘There are 3 methods by which a member can receive tax relief on their relievable pension contributions. A member may not choose which method of tax relief applies to their contributions; this is determined by the method the pension scheme is allowed to operate under the legislation.’ (Technical Pages: Contributions and tax relief: Member contributions: Methods of claiming tax relief: The different methods).


RPSM 05101340 s191 (3) and s191 (4 and 8)


[s191(3)]

Situation 1 – occupational pension schemes

Net pay arrangements may be used if all the following criteria are met

  • The pension scheme is an occupational pension scheme, and
  • The member is an employee of a sponsoring employer of the pension scheme, and
  • All the other contributing scheme members who are employees of the same employer are also receiving tax relief under the net pay arrangement.

We expect most occupational schemes will continue to use the net pay arrangements for making member contributions and receiving tax relief.


Situation 2

[s191(4 & 8)]

Net pay arrangements may be used if the following criteria are met

  • The pension scheme is a public service pension scheme (such as the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme or the Local Government Pension Scheme) or is a marine pilots’ benefit, and
  • The member is an employee.

A marine pilots’ benefit fund is

  • A fund established under section 15(1)(i) of the Pilotage Act 1983, or
  • Any scheme supplementing or replacing such a fund.’

(Technical Pages: Contributions and tax relief: Member contributions: Methods of claiming tax relief: Which scheme can use the net pay arrangement).


Limitations to current NPAs.

  • The scheme must be occupational.
  • Employee’s can only be entitled to claim Net Pay Arrangements 'NPAs', if they are sponsored by the employer.
  • Also all other members of the scheme are receiving tax relief through this scheme.

Changes for practicality.

  • First allow NPAs to be claimed through tax allowance after the individual has paid their National Insurance Contribution 'NIC' (using this method the state pension is not affected through salary reduction), so through receiving a tax allowance (Specific pension tax allowance, CPR or Tax free account) it enables the NPA to be attained without employer’s sponsorship and on an individual basis.
  • Also the individual's salary is not reduced unlike in salary sacrifice schemes so mortgage applications are likely to be more successful.
  • Finally employers do not get the chance to pay less National Insurance Contributions through salary reduction (in salary sacrifice schemes) and then not pass the savings on to employees' pension schemes.


RPSM 05101350 (Note that this is only available if individuals are members of occupational pensions or public sector pensions).



‘Which individuals can make contributions under net pay arrangements.


Only an individual entitled to tax relief who is


  • Both a member of an occupational pension scheme and an employee of a sponsoring employer for that scheme, or
  • An employee member of a public service pension scheme, or
  • An employee member of the marine pilot’s benefit fund

May have their relievable pension contributions relieved through the net pay arrangement.


If a third party makes a relievable pension contribution in respect of a member the contribution cannot be paid via the net payment arrangement. Tax relief will be available to the member but by way of a claim – generally through the Self Assessment system.


Where relief is given on relievable pension contributions through the net pay arrangement relief may not be given by any other method.


A scheme member can only pay contributions to an occupational pension scheme under the net pay arrangement if all the other members who are employees of their employer are also making contributions under the net pay arrangement. An employer can not choose to let one group of employees in a scheme pay contributions under net pay and other group pay contributions under relief at source.’

(Technical Pages: Contributions and tax relief: Member contributions: Methods of claiming tax relief: Individuals who can use net pay arrangements).


Changes for availability.


Allow anyone to have an NPA, through post NIC but pre income tax pension contributions. Offer a personal allowance to anybody that pays into a private pension scheme.


Flaws to this new system

  • When income is lower than pension contributions the needed tax relief cannot be claimed through NPA.

This is a problem under the existing system and the current solution is to;


RPSM 05101360 s193 (4) States this as a limitation with the current system. It also suggests that the member of the scheme should make a claim to obtain the balance of the tax relief available on the contribution, this is generally done in the annual self-assessment system.


‘Claims for relief where net pay cannot be applied.

There may be instances where insufficient relief has been given through the net pay arrangement because

  • The amount of relievable pension contributions paid by a member to one or more pension schemes operating the net pay arrangement in a tax year is more than the employment income they receive from the individual’s sponsoring employer(s) for the tax year
  • It is not possible for the sponsoring employer or employers to deduct the whole amount of the contribution from the individual’s employment income.

In these circumstances a member may make a claim to obtain the balance of tax relief available on the contribution, generally via the Self Assessment system.'

(Technical Pages: Contributions and tax relief: Member contributions: Methods of claiming tax relief: Claims for relief where net pay cannot be applied).'

Since writing this paper the Registered Pension Schemes Manual 'RPSM' has been superseded by the Pensions Tax Manual 'PTM'. The Pensions Tax Manual is available at the UK Inland Revenue's website along with other technical papers including the Employment Income Manual 'EIM', which is the relevant technical paper for Retirement Benefit Schemes.

surely you were quoted, cited and credited accordingly?
 
You guys are falling into the trap of giving publicity to ET's favorite unsponsoring sponsor. He's been doing it for years now.

He even wrote a letter to the White House once, and got a personalized response. Ask him, he'll tell you! The US economy will be saved with his new economic theories, just like how his economic theories helped the UK navigate Brexit.
 
My daughter wrote a letter to the White House as part of a Junior High project and got a personalized response.

You guys are falling into the trap of giving publicity to ET's favorite unsponsoring sponsor. He's been doing it for years now.

He even wrote a letter to the White House once, and got a personalized response. Ask him, he'll tell you! The US economy will be saved with his new economic theories, just like how his economic theories helped the UK navigate Brexit.
 
My daughter wrote a letter to the White House as part of a Junior High project and got a personalized response.
My mother sent her copy of "Fala" to FDR for him to sign. He not only signed it, he put Fala's paw print on the inside front cover. We still have the book. Its priceless.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fala_(dog)

s-l300.jpg


The more things change....

"These Republican leaders have not been content with attacks on me, or my wife, or on my sons. No, not content with that, they now include my little dog, Fala. Well, of course, I don't resent attacks, and my family don't resent attacks, but Fala does resent them. You know, Fala is Scotch, and being a Scottie, as soon as he learned that the Republican fiction writers in Congress and out had concocted a story that I'd left him behind on an Aleutian island and had sent a destroyer back to find him – at a cost to the taxpayers of two or three, or eight or twenty million dollars – his Scotch soul was furious. He has not been the same dog since. I am accustomed to hearing malicious falsehoods about myself ... But I think I have a right to resent, to object, to libelous statements about my dog."
:cool:
 
Last edited:
I have written a letter to the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom regarding economic growth. The letter was originally published at morganist economics.

http://morganisteconomics.blogspot.com/2020/06/letter-to-prime-minister-of-united.html

"To: 10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA

To: The Prime Minister the Rt Hon Boris Johnson.


Regarding: Concerns Over Negative Economic Growth Rate.


Sunday, 14th June 2020.


I am a macroeconomist and have my own school of economic thought 'Morganist Economics' which the British government uses extensively. I have become concerned about the rate of economic growth which has been predicted to fall to -11.5% for the year, as a result of the Corona Virus. I have been developing new alternative economic growth tools that could be used to stimulate the economy to compensate for the loss of trade caused by the lockdown.


I have been working on generating economic growth through taxation exemptions for further work or supplementary income. There are two new techniques I have pioneered the Rising Personal Allowance on Income for Dual occupation, the 'R-PAID' and the Secondary Allowance for Supplementary Income, the 'SASI'. There is massive potential for economic growth from allowing taxation exemptions for supplementary work without consequences.


I have enclosed a letter which I sent to the Chancellor of the Exchequer earlier this year that puts forward the suggestion of introducing the R-PAID to stimulate economic growth and supplement the workforce's income. There is more work on the subject at my website, which is available on the 'Supplementary Income' page. Taxation exemptions for further work should not impact the existing taxation revenue and should stimulate more economic growth.


Kind Regards.

Peter James Rhys Morgan."
Oh No! Not again! God help the Prime Minister.
 
Back
Top