Quote from tradertony76:
Exactly. First you get the money....then you get the power....THEN you get the women.
Thems the rules.
tradertony that is a statistically invalid quote. what follows is an utterly useless thought experiment for all u quants, im a bored lonely ass (prob cause my gf just left me i dont know whether to do

or

. im

cause i can finally get away from her, im

because no1 sleeps next to me anymore.
ok quantatively here it is:
Assuming chicks are normally distributed with a mean of 5 and a standard deviation of 2. A hot chick can be defined as a woman who is one standard deviation or more above the mean. Now that gives 30 out of a random sample of 100 women that id rank as hot. assume that you have a 15% success ratio with women in this range. That gives a total of about 4 women out of 100 that are hot and that would go out with you. maybe 50% of that 4 will sleep with you. leaving you with 2 women to choose from.
Now paying for 3 dates each with 4 different women who are hot will cost you a MAXIMUM of USD1,000. assuming that your capital to start this endeavour is 10,000 then you'd expect to experience a 20% drawdown before you get lucky and sleep with a nice hot chick.
Trading on the other hand is a much more difficult maneuver. To "get rich" means that you much have at least a Return of capital on the initial 10,000 of 100-500% per annum and to do that ull most likely experience drawdowns more than 50%.
we assume you only want power so that you can get the women.
So there you go, why trade to get rich to get women, when statistically it is easier, more cost effective and better profit factor

to just get a gf?
Warning: past performance with women is no indication of future returns. Dating beautiful women is a highly leveraged exposure and the potential for profit and loss exceeding the inital investment is great. A relatively small movement of your mouth will have a proportionately larger impact on her emotions due to this leveraged exposure. This may work against you as well as for you.