Quote from TSGannGalt:
I have to agree to TRYK regarding how the business structures are set for broker-driven prop firms. Though, prop. firms that are profit driven do exist:
It's no business for light-weights.
it's the recent discovery watching forex and how the stock markets are developing identifiably obvious computer trading patterns, especially in the early and late hours of the day.
spot forex being the topic. i've read and heard that it's got the highest failure rate, but again, it's all technical. it's not that difficult if you understand what the matrix is showing you.
i see the girl in the red dress because she's just so damn obvious. everyone else sees green.
the "triangle" formation is popping up everywhere as well, where you can literally set your stops to mimic whomever is out there running these things. they must be big fish, or all the fish are swimming in the same direction, their ai detecting the movements and turning to follow.
i've set my own automated trading by it, using a whole series of cascading buyins and exit stops, cutting pieces out of a stock literally all day without touching the keyboard to interrupt it because the patterns are so consistent.
RTP a few months ago was incredible, every day the same gap up, sideways to close until it reached a set point and then a clawback.
i could name a dozen others but i can't be giving away all my secrets. most third tier props aren't going to teach the 5% of "losers" how to make money doing that, when really it's just a simple scripting execution program.
IT driven can mean many things. at the simplest level, i program my 7 button mouse to do a variety of functions otherwise function keys. where most guys are slumped over their keyboards hitting it with carpal tunnel syndrome inducing rapidity, i'm sitting back letting the mouse do the work.
combinations of clicks can set stops, lot sizes, price levels, change price increments, even just scalp 100 shares at a time .05 cents a click.
it's quite remarkable how easy it is to make money in the markets now that they've become automated and computerised.
i don't think needing a harvard mba or 5 years of profitable numbers is required to break into tier 1. i could probably sit for a month trading 100K and make my salary for the first year of my contract within a few weeks. it's not brain surgery.
thanks for the great post. about time someone said something intelligent besides me.
cheers.
rb.