Quote from DHOHHI:
Sorry Rockford but your "detective" work isn't correct.
I have multiple accounts at a single bank and have in excess of $100,000 and it's all insured. Setting up one, or more, POD accounts is all it takes.
No, my information was correct.
We weren't talking about trust accounts. We were talking about accounts in the trader's name.
If the trader creates a P.O.D. trust account, in the name of a spouse, child, grandchild, parent, or sibling, then the trader is no longer considered the account owner for FDIC purposes. FDIC treats the account as owned by the spouse, child, grandchild, parent or sibling named as the beneficiary. Your spouse, child, grandchild, parent, or sibling P.O.D. trust account receives no more than $100,000 in FDIC coverage. If you have, for example, only two spouses, children, grandchildren, parents, or siblings, then you can only receive $100,000 in coverage for each of them, making a total of $200,000 in coverage for your relatives.
If, for example, you have no living spouse, child, grandchild, parent, or sibling, then you cannot obtain any of this type of FDIC coverage at all.
None of these details are relevant. One of the issues is the false claim that E-trade accounts carry more insurance coverage, more safety, and more legal protection and remedies than Interactive Brokers. Everything stylark3 told us, in favor of E-trade, was just a bunch of lies. Another issue is that the source of that information, stylark3, is a person who should have no credibility, because he goes far beyond mere errors. He makes not the slightest effort to verify his information which is obviously harmful to others, and he makes those false facts up out of thin air, and fails to acknowledge his errors. Everything he says should be approached with the deepest suspicions. I think he will need to register under a different EliteTrader username if he wants to continue promoting E-Trade on this site.