So, I have an account with 2.5x in it.
I have .825x of this holding positions, a good bit of which is short volatility products. I know, risky. But this is a margin account, and not only am I not above my investment amount, but of my cash in there, I'm only using 33% of it to hold positions - 64% is literally sitting to the side, uninvested.
So, I wanted to take .5x out to set up a separate account in my and my wife's name as we get better account insurance protection that way. So I look at my available funds, thinking it would be huge, and its only roughly .7x. So, let's say I took out .7x. My funds still in the account would be 1.8x. So I would hold 46% of my account in positions (.825/1.8), so 54% of my account in cash. And literally if my positions moved against me by the smallest amount I would be facing margin calls, despite the fact that I am not even close to being 100% invested (much less using margin to leverage over 100% invested), only 46% invested!??!
I know that there are special margin requirements for these short volatility positions, but I've also read that IB has nutty margin requirements.
So, question. I asked a few months ago if any brokers could beat, or were equal to, IB in like stock/futures/options prices/margin borrowing rates, and the response I got was generally, no. So, new question - can any brokers get anywhere in the same neighborhood, but have more reasonable margin requirements? This seems insane. If this is some federally mandated requirement, I will understand. But I don't think so given the complaints I've read on here about IB margin requirements over several months at least.
Thanks ladies and gents!
I have .825x of this holding positions, a good bit of which is short volatility products. I know, risky. But this is a margin account, and not only am I not above my investment amount, but of my cash in there, I'm only using 33% of it to hold positions - 64% is literally sitting to the side, uninvested.
So, I wanted to take .5x out to set up a separate account in my and my wife's name as we get better account insurance protection that way. So I look at my available funds, thinking it would be huge, and its only roughly .7x. So, let's say I took out .7x. My funds still in the account would be 1.8x. So I would hold 46% of my account in positions (.825/1.8), so 54% of my account in cash. And literally if my positions moved against me by the smallest amount I would be facing margin calls, despite the fact that I am not even close to being 100% invested (much less using margin to leverage over 100% invested), only 46% invested!??!
I know that there are special margin requirements for these short volatility positions, but I've also read that IB has nutty margin requirements.
So, question. I asked a few months ago if any brokers could beat, or were equal to, IB in like stock/futures/options prices/margin borrowing rates, and the response I got was generally, no. So, new question - can any brokers get anywhere in the same neighborhood, but have more reasonable margin requirements? This seems insane. If this is some federally mandated requirement, I will understand. But I don't think so given the complaints I've read on here about IB margin requirements over several months at least.
Thanks ladies and gents!