Quote from travis:
This strategy, more or less, intermittently, makes money, but that is not the point. Let's think about why it should make money, and if it's likely to make money in the future.
That is a clearly stated strategy. It is interesting you want to know WHY your strategy works. Reading your comments it is very clear how each qualifier reduces the opportunity of a negative expectancy trade.
It seems that strategy will make money in markets that reverse off of old and new highs. That the price must be within a narrow range, reversing, and within the time paramaters of >40 min, I would reckon the trade is rather intermittent for each index or equity it trades.
For predicting whether the strategy will remain "intermittently profitable" consider what scenarios would generate losing trades. 40 minutes pass since the new high occurred, the stock is trading in the top of the channels, and reverses enough for the 6 and 15 minute MA's to cross, but the reverse is false and the trade continues higher... how often does that happen?