perhaps this is a confusion about directional vs arbitrage trading?Including div,conversion looks in line to me,give or take pennies..
on conversion/reversal for locking up the arb's, yes, you're 100% correct.. that's exactly what i meant above when i said it would offset the ATM synthetic long.. you have to short the shares to complete the conversion, yes, but i figured we were on the same page there lol
but when MMs price the options to account for the carry costs, the skewed pricing structure it creates as a side effect enables the creation of positive expectancy directional trades.. at least that's how i understand the root cause of vol skew's existence..
the skew is irrelevant to the conversion arb because it's essentially just the market's way of negating the arb..
but trading directionally, you definitely see it.. in a perfectly efficient market, the percentage you pay for any spread will be equal to your probability of profit.. using skew to enhance directionality, you can pay less than your probability, hence, positive expectancy..
essentially, you're pocketing the pricing difference in options necessary to lock up conversion arb's and taking on a directional risk in exchange for that.. or such is my understanding of what's happening when you use skew dynamics to accentuate directionality..
Last edited:
