I am interested in many things, among them are trading and chess.
In chess, typically the better players have focused primarily on chess for many years. It is clear that they have spent many hours almost every day thinking deeply about chess. In the absence of competing hobbies, this would likely mean they continue to think about chess "in the background". For example, while they're at work, an idea related to a chess game they were analyzing comes to mind.
Can you become a more-than-profitable trader if you are not thinking about trading "in the background"? When I say more-than-profitable, I mean a profit that makes it worth your while, not "look I'm profitable, I almost made the risk free rate of return".
There are many examples of world class chess players who were also successful in other difficult fields (nuclear physicist, professional trader, etc), but maybe these guys are just geniuses. My guess would be that, for the rest of us, having a "second hobby" places a serious handicap on achieving competency in the first.
In chess, typically the better players have focused primarily on chess for many years. It is clear that they have spent many hours almost every day thinking deeply about chess. In the absence of competing hobbies, this would likely mean they continue to think about chess "in the background". For example, while they're at work, an idea related to a chess game they were analyzing comes to mind.
Can you become a more-than-profitable trader if you are not thinking about trading "in the background"? When I say more-than-profitable, I mean a profit that makes it worth your while, not "look I'm profitable, I almost made the risk free rate of return".
There are many examples of world class chess players who were also successful in other difficult fields (nuclear physicist, professional trader, etc), but maybe these guys are just geniuses. My guess would be that, for the rest of us, having a "second hobby" places a serious handicap on achieving competency in the first.