Quote from Thunderdog:
A fool and his money...
I guess the fool in question parted with both his money and his job, eh?
Conspicuous consumption is, by definition, fashioned to draw attention. Well, it has drawn that attention.
If I'm going to have an overpriced watch, I'd rather it actually be a Rolex, because those things are sturdy as hell, so at least you're getting something a little extra for the crazy price. It is also one of the best watches ever made. And I would get it in nondescript steel. Oh, I already have one! Bought it in 1983, and it has been to hell and back since that time. I doubt most other watches would have endured the treatment it has gotten. It will likely be my last watch unless I visit New York and sign up for the requisite tourist mugging.Quote from marketsurfer:
...unlike a diamond encrusted rolex-- sophisticated wealthy people simply do not buy things conspicuous like that-- but they will by a Patek for its stealth wealth status...
(Nothing happened the last few times I was there. Perhaps I wasn't there long enough.)Quote from marketsurfer:
it was targeted for the winners and /or high salary institurional trader types
losers could never afford nor want to have the things advertised.
obviously, someone buys this stuff and the marketers know it.
surf
Quote from Thunderdog:
If I'm going to have an overpriced watch, I'd rather it actually be a Rolex, because those things are sturdy as hell, so at least you're getting something a little extra for the crazy price. And I would get it in nondescript steel. Oh, I already have one! Bought it in 1983, and it has been to hell and back since that time. I doubt most other watches would have endured the treatment it has gotten. It will likely be my last watch unless I visit New York and sign up for the requisite tourist mugging. (Nothing happened the last few times I was there. Perhaps I wasn't there long enough.)

Quote from Thunderdog:
If I'm going to have an overpriced watch, I'd rather it actually be a Rolex, because those things are sturdy as hell, so at least you're getting something a little extra for the crazy price. It is also one of the best watches ever made. And I would get it in nondescript steel. Oh, I already have one! ...

Quote from TraderZones:
There is something wrong with a person who is unhappy with less than a $10,000+ watch. It keeps no better time than a $400 watch.
Having nice things that improve your life is good. Trying to impress other people is called "grow up a little."

I know that. I splurged back then because I wanted to have one of the best and sturdiest. It's kind of a backhanded approach to value. (That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.) I know it was overpriced, although it has since increased in 'retail value" by a few hundred percent. What I, personally, regard as superfluous spending is paying more for something that has no incremental value other than "show," without actually being better than a lower priced item in one way or another. I admit to treading a fine line, but I still think that the distinction can be made.Quote from marketsurfer:
rolex, or texas timex as those in the KNOW refer to them, is a good watch. but far too common for what i am talking about...
surf![]()